• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

萨普森方程在儿童 LDL-C 估算中的应用:BLIP 研究中与 LDL 直接测量和弗雷德瓦尔德方程的比较。

Application of the Sampson equation to estimate LDL-C in children: Comparison with LDL direct measurement and Friedewald equation in the BLIP study.

机构信息

Medical and Surgical Sciences Dept., Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Medical and Surgical Sciences Dept., Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1911-1915. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.034. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.034
PMID:33962827
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In epidemiological trials and in clinical practices, it is relevant to have affordable and reliable methods to measure the main lipid cardiovascular risk factors, and in particular low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma level. In this context, we aimed to compare the reliability of the Friedewald's (LDL-Cf) and Sampson's (LDL-Cs) equations with the LDL-value dosed by a validated dosage method (LDL-Cd) in a large cohort of children.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We considered the lipid values of 145 infants, 278 preschoolers, 810 scholar children, and 1372 adolescents (Total N. 2605, 1291 males, 1314 females), with mean total cholesterol (TC) = 169.8 ± 39.7 mg/dL, HDL-Cholesterol = 50.8 ± 12.7 mg/dL, non HDL-Cholesterol = 118.9 ± 35.9 mg/dL, Triglycerides (TG) = 90.3 ± 77.9 mg/dL, LDL-Cd = 106.2 ± 29.9 mg/dL, LDL-Cf = 100.9 ± 33.8 mg/dL, and LDL-Cs = 102.2 ± 33.4 mg/dL. Comparing the distance to the LDL-Cd, Friedewald's equation mildly but significantly underestimated in infants (3.4 ± 5.3 mg/dL), preschoolers (1.5 ± 7.1 mg/dL). Children (1.2 ± 2.2 mg/dL) and adolescents (1.1 ± 5.9 mg/dL) compared to Sampson's equation (all comparisons, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis, being carried out on a large population sample, shows that Sampson's equation is more reliable than Friedewald's one at each considered age class and even for extreme TG values.

摘要

背景与目的

在流行病学研究和临床实践中,需要有经济实惠且可靠的方法来测量主要的血脂心血管风险因素,特别是低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的血浆水平。在这种情况下,我们旨在比较 Friedewald 方程(LDL-Cf)和 Sampson 方程(LDL-Cs)与经验证的检测方法(LDL-Cd)测量的 LDL 值的可靠性,并在一个大样本的儿童队列中进行评估。

方法和结果

我们分析了 145 名婴儿、278 名学龄前儿童、810 名学龄儿童和 1372 名青少年(总计 2605 名儿童,1291 名男性,1314 名女性)的血脂值,平均总胆固醇(TC)为 169.8±39.7mg/dL,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)为 50.8±12.7mg/dL,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)为 118.9±35.9mg/dL,三酰甘油(TG)为 90.3±77.9mg/dL,LDL-Cd 为 106.2±29.9mg/dL,LDL-Cf 为 100.9±33.8mg/dL,LDL-Cs 为 102.2±33.4mg/dL。与 LDL-Cd 相比,Friedewald 方程在婴儿(3.4±5.3mg/dL)、学龄前儿童(1.5±7.1mg/dL)、儿童(1.2±2.2mg/dL)和青少年(1.1±5.9mg/dL)中均轻度但显著低估(所有比较,p<0.001)。

结论

我们的分析结果基于大样本人群,表明在每个考虑的年龄组中,Sampson 方程比 Friedewald 方程更可靠,甚至对于极端 TG 值也是如此。

相似文献

1
Application of the Sampson equation to estimate LDL-C in children: Comparison with LDL direct measurement and Friedewald equation in the BLIP study.萨普森方程在儿童 LDL-C 估算中的应用:BLIP 研究中与 LDL 直接测量和弗雷德瓦尔德方程的比较。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1911-1915. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.034. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Comparative assessment of LDL-C and VLDL-C estimation in familial combined hyperlipidemia using Sampson's, Martin's and Friedewald's equations.应用 Sampson's、Martin's 和 Friedewald 方程评估家族性混合性高脂血症患者 LDL-C 和 VLDL-C 的估算值。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 May 5;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01471-3.
3
Comparison of Various Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Calculators: Is It Time for the Friedewald Equation to Go in India?各种低密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算方法的比较:是时候让印度淘汰 Friedewald 方程了吗?
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Sep;72(9):e1-e5. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0645.
4
Validation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in pediatric population.验证低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程在儿科人群中的适用性。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 5;11:e14544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14544. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels.比较高甘油三酯血症患者估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817.
6
Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化患者 LDL 胆固醇测定的标准方程之间的差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;79(6):530-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042.
7
Comparison of modified Friedewald's formula with direct measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in Bangladeshi population.改良的弗瑞德瓦尔德公式与直接测量孟加拉人群低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比较。
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2013 Dec;39(3):120-3. doi: 10.3329/bmrcb.v39i3.20312.
8
Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile.比较新型方法与 Friedewald 方程,用于从标准血脂谱估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2061-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280532.
9
Validation of Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations.验证 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0263860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263860. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparing a novel equation for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the Friedewald equation: A VOYAGER analysis.将一种计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的新方程与Friedewald方程进行比较:VOYAGER分析。
Clin Biochem. 2019 Feb;64:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond LDL cholesterol: remnant cholesterol is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in children.超越低密度脂蛋白胆固醇:残余胆固醇与儿童心血管代谢危险因素相关。
BMC Med. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03859-9.
2
Cholesterol-Lowering Bioactive Foods and Nutraceuticals in Pediatrics: Clinical Evidence of Efficacy and Safety.儿科降脂生物活性食品和营养保健品:疗效和安全性的临床证据。
Nutrients. 2024 May 18;16(10):1526. doi: 10.3390/nu16101526.
3
Concordance of LDL-C Estimating Equations with Direct Enzymatic Measurement in Diabetic and Prediabetic Subjects.
糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)估算方程与直接酶法测量的一致性
J Clin Med. 2023 May 20;12(10):3570. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103570.
4
Validation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in pediatric population.验证低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程在儿科人群中的适用性。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 5;11:e14544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14544. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of Estimated LDL Cholesterol Equations with Direct Measurement in Patients with Angiographically Confirmed Coronary Artery Disease.在经血管造影证实患有冠状动脉疾病的患者中,估计低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程与直接测量法的比较。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 7;9(10):342. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100342.
6
Epidemiology of dyslipidemia in Tunisia, HSHS 3 study (Hammam Sousse Sahloul Heart Study).突尼斯血脂异常的流行病学研究,HSHS 3 研究(哈马姆苏塞萨赫尔心脏研究)。
Tunis Med. 2022;100(4):323-334.
7
Recent Advances on Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年家族性高胆固醇血症的最新进展
Biomedicines. 2022 Apr 30;10(5):1043. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051043.
8
Validation of Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations.验证 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0263860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263860. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluation of Sampson equation for LDL-C in acute coronary syndrome patients: a Chinese population-based cohort study.基于中国人群队列研究评价 Sampson 方程在急性冠状动脉综合征患者 LDL-C 中的应用。
Lipids Health Dis. 2022 Apr 19;21(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12944-022-01648-4.