• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何优化儿科放射性药物处方的药物分析?

How can we optimise the pharmaceutical analysis of radiopharmaceutical pediatric prescriptions?

机构信息

Radio-Pharmacology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.

Pharmacy and Sterilization Department, AP-HP Université Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, Île-de-France, France.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jan;30(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002473. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002473
PMID:33962998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9811567/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In France, dispensation is defined by the validation of a prescription associated with a pharmaceutical analysis, preparation of medication and provision of information necessary for proper use. There are very few data available in the literature that describe prescription analysis modality in radiopharmacy. The aim was to secure a place for paediatric prescription analysis in radiopharmacy by designing a flow chart validated by experts.

METHODS

Experts from different disciplines and health setups (ie, public, private) were selected to represent the various paediatric patient care processes. A review of the literature on pharmaceutical analysis and paediatric prescription in radiopharmacy was conducted. A Delphi approach comprising two rounds (Google Form survey) was used to validate the flow chart. Answers were graded according to a nine-point Likert scale for agreement. Open-ended questions allowed experts to comment on the propositions. A consensus between experts was reached if more than 70% of the experts agreed on an item and fewer than 30% disagreed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five experts were solicited: two oncopaediatricians, three nuclear medicine physicians, 46 radiopharmacists, three residents in radiopharmacy, one hospital pharmacist, five medical physicists, one pharmacy technician, two X-ray technicians and two patients who are pharmacists. The first round survey included a draft of the flow chart: 31 experts answered (48%). All professional disciplines were represented except pharmacy technician. The second round survey was sent with a new flow chart that had been improved by the experts' comments. After 3 weeks, 18 answers were obtained (28%). After the first round, consensus was obtained for each item. Experts gave a total of 97 comments. The second flow chart had three steps: regulatory aspects, patient data, and radiopharmaceutical data, and it was accompanied by descriptive text explaining the field of application.

CONCLUSION

The resulting flow chart will secure the pharmaceutical analysis step for this special patient population.

摘要

目的

在法国,配药是指对处方进行验证,包括药物分析、药物制备以及提供正确使用所需的信息。文献中很少有数据描述放射药学中的处方分析模式。本研究旨在通过设计一个经专家验证的流程图,为儿科处方分析在放射药学中的应用提供依据。

方法

从不同学科和医疗环境(即公共、私人)中选择专家来代表各种儿科患者的护理流程。对放射药学中的药物分析和儿科处方进行文献复习。采用两轮德尔菲法(Google 表单调查)来验证流程图。答案按照九点李克特量表进行评分,以表示同意程度。开放问题允许专家对建议进行评论。如果超过 70%的专家同意某一项,而少于 30%的专家不同意,则达成专家共识。

结果

共征求了 65 名专家的意见:2 名肿瘤儿科医生、3 名核医学医生、46 名放射药剂师、3 名放射药学住院医师、1 名医院药剂师、5 名医学物理学家、1 名药剂技术员、2 名 X 光技术员和 2 名药剂师患者。第一轮调查包括流程图草案:31 名专家回答(48%)。除了药剂技术员外,所有专业学科都有代表。第二轮调查发送了一份经过专家评论改进的新流程图,3 周后收到 18 份回复(28%)。第一轮后,每个项目都达成了共识。专家共提出了 97 条意见。第二张流程图有三个步骤:监管方面、患者数据和放射药物数据,并附有说明应用领域的描述性文字。

结论

生成的流程图将确保为这一特殊患者群体提供药物分析步骤。

相似文献

1
How can we optimise the pharmaceutical analysis of radiopharmaceutical pediatric prescriptions?如何优化儿科放射性药物处方的药物分析?
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jan;30(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002473. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Use of the Delphi technique to determine safety features to be included in a neonatal and paediatric prescription chart.运用德尔菲法确定新生儿及儿科处方笺应包含的安全特征。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;36(6):1179-89. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-0014-y. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
Two-round Delphi technique for the consensual design of a paediatric pharmaceutical care model.两轮德尔菲技术共识设计儿科药物治疗模式。
Pharmacol Res. 2013 Feb;68(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
4
Pharmaceutical counseling: Between evidence-based medicine and profits.药学咨询:在循证医学与利润之间
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S87-8. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150701.
5
Expert Consensus on a List of Inappropriate Prescribing after Prescription Review in Pediatric Units in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.科特迪瓦阿比让儿科病房处方审核后不适当处方清单专家共识
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2021 Aug 27;10:79-91. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S322141. eCollection 2021.
6
Development of the adult complexity tool for pharmaceutical care (ACTPC) in hospital: A modified Delphi study.开发成人药物治疗复杂性工具(ACTPC)在医院:一项修正后的德尔菲研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Nov;17(11):1907-1922. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
7
Pharmacy students teaching prescribers strategies to lower prescription drug costs for underserved patients.药学专业学生向开处方者传授为服务不足的患者降低处方药成本的策略。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):534-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.534.
8
Development of a virtual classroom for pre-analytical phase of laboratory medicine for undergraduate medical students using the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲法为医学本科生开发医学检验分析前虚拟课堂
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0264447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264447. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluation of community pharmacy tech-check-tech as a strategy for practice advancement.评估社区药房技术人员相互检查作为实践推进策略的效果。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Nov-Dec;58(6):652-658. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Defining and identifying concepts of medication literacy: An international perspective.定义和识别药物素养的概念:国际视角。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Sep;14(9):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Implementation of a Professional Practices Evaluation during Radiopharmaceuticals Administration.放射性药物给药过程中专业实践评估的开发与实施
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;10(11):2247. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112247.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of pharmacist interventions on medication errors in hospitalized pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药师干预对住院儿科患者用药错误的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Aug;42(4):979-994. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01034-z. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Full report on a survey of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals from 1975 to 2017 in Japan.日本 1975 年至 2017 年放射性药物不良反应调查的全面报告。
Ann Nucl Med. 2020 Apr;34(4):299-304. doi: 10.1007/s12149-020-01439-w. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
The Global Perspective of Pharmacovigilance in Nuclear Medicine Practice.核医学实践中药品警戒的全球视角
Indian J Nucl Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;33(4):269-272. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_103_18.
4
Practical Indication-Based Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Studies: Update and Review.基于实际指征的儿科核医学研究:更新与综述
Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;55(4):803-844. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
5
Evaluation of Radiopharmaceutical Adverse Reaction Reports to the British Nuclear Medicine Society from 2007 to 2016.2007年至2016年向英国核医学学会提交的放射性药物不良反应报告评估
J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):2010-2012. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.194092. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
[Selection and optimal sequence of critical elements for medication review: A simulation with hospital pharmacy residents].
Ann Pharm Fr. 2017 Mar;75(2):131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
Development of a consensus-base list of criteria for prescribing medication in a pediatric population.制定一份关于儿科人群用药处方的基于共识的标准清单。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Oct;37(5):883-94. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0139-7. Epub 2015 May 28.
8
Adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals in France: analysis of the national pharmacovigilance database.法国放射性药物的不良反应:国家药物警戒数据库分析
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jan;49(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/1060028014558153. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
9
Advances in radiation biology: effect on nuclear medicine.辐射生物学的进展:对核医学的影响。
Semin Nucl Med. 2014 May;44(3):179-86. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.03.004.
10
Medication errors: neonates, infants and children are the most vulnerable!用药错误:新生儿、婴儿和儿童最为脆弱!
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Apr;13(2):65-7. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-13.2.65.