ARCUS Sportklinik Pforzheim, Rastatterstr. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3075-3082. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03921-0. Epub 2021 May 8.
The aim of this study was to assess perioperative pain and mobilization after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using three different surgical approaches.
This was a multisurgeon, prospective, single-center cohort study. A total of 188 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty (THA) between February 2019 and April 2019 were analyzed according to the surgical approach used (direct anterior, lateral, and posterior approach). Outcome parameters were the daily walking distance during the inpatient stay, the pain level according to the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and motion during the inpatient stay and at 6-week follow-up and the modified Harris Hips Score (mHHS) preoperatively and at 6 weeks.
The walking distance within the groups increased significantly during the inpatient stay (p < 0.001). The DAA and posterior approach patients had a significantly longer walking distance than the lateral approach patients on the third postoperative day (DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.02; posterior vs. lateral 3, p = 0.03). DAA and posterior approach patients reported significantly less pain during motion on the third postoperative day and at 6-week follow-up than the lateral approach patients (3 postoperative day: DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.011; posterior vs. lateral, p = 0.04; 6 weeks control: DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.001; Posterior vs. lateral 3, p = 0.005). The mHHS demonstrated significant improvement within each group. However, lateral approach patients reported significantly less improvement than the DAA and posterior approach patients (DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.007; posterior vs. lateral, p = 0.021).
This study analyzed perioperative pain progression and short-term rehabilitation after THA according to the different surgical approaches. Direct anterior and posterior approaches have shown comparable improvements in pain, walking distance, and mHHS. Whether this effect persists over a longer period of time must be clarified in future studies.
Prospective cohort study, level of evidence, 2.
本研究旨在评估三种不同手术入路全髋关节置换术(THA)术后的围手术期疼痛和活动情况。
这是一项多外科医生、前瞻性、单中心队列研究。根据手术入路(直接前入路、外侧入路和后侧入路),分析了 2019 年 2 月至 2019 年 4 月期间接受髋关节置换术(THA)的 188 名患者。观察指标为住院期间的日常步行距离、住院期间和 6 周随访时的静息和运动时视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术前和 6 周的改良 Harris 髋关节评分(mHHS)。
各组的步行距离在住院期间均显著增加(p<0.001)。DAA 和后入路患者在术后第 3 天的步行距离明显长于外侧入路患者(DAA 与外侧入路,p=0.02;后入路与外侧入路,p=0.03)。DAA 和后入路患者在术后第 3 天和 6 周随访时的运动时疼痛明显低于外侧入路患者(术后第 3 天:DAA 与外侧入路,p=0.011;后入路与外侧入路,p=0.04;6 周时:DAA 与外侧入路,p=0.001;后入路与外侧入路,p=0.005)。mHHS 在每组内均有显著改善。然而,外侧入路患者的改善程度明显低于 DAA 和后入路患者(DAA 与外侧入路,p=0.007;后入路与外侧入路,p=0.021)。
本研究根据不同的手术入路分析了 THA 后的围手术期疼痛进展和短期康复情况。直接前入路和后入路在疼痛、步行距离和 mHHS 方面均有相似的改善。这种效果是否能在较长时间内持续,必须在未来的研究中加以阐明。
前瞻性队列研究,证据等级 2 级。