• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas with flow diverters. A case report and systematic review.采用血流导向装置治疗颈动脉海绵窦瘘。病例报告和系统评价。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Feb;28(1):70-83. doi: 10.1177/15910199211014701. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
Efficiency of endovascular management with a combination of Onyx and coils for direct and indirect carotid cavernous fistula treatment: Experience of a single center.单纯使用 Onyx 胶联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗直接和间接颈动脉海绵窦瘘的有效性:单中心经验。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 May;228:107700. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107700. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
The evolution of endovascular treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas: a single-center experience.颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗演变:单中心经验。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):538-48. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.033. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
4
Multimodal Management of Carotid-Cavernous Fistulas.颈动脉海绵窦瘘的多模态治疗。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e796-e803. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Endovascular Modalities for the Treatment of Cavernous Sinus Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Single-Center Experience.海绵窦动静脉瘘治疗的血管内治疗方式:单中心经验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Dec;24(12):2824-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
6
Treatment of post-traumatic direct carotid-cavernous fistulas using flow diverting stents: Is it alone satisfactory?使用血流导向装置治疗创伤性直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘:单独使用是否满意?
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Apr;86:230-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.01.047. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Transvenous approach for the treatment of direct carotid cavernous fistula following Pipeline embolization of cavernous carotid aneurysm: a report of two cases and review of the literature.经静脉途径治疗海绵窦段颈内动脉瘤Pipeline栓塞术后直接型海绵窦瘘:两例报告并文献复习
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Aug;7(8):e30. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011235.rep. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Long-term outcome of endovascular treatment for indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas.间接颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗的长期结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Mar;56(3):E5. doi: 10.3171/2023.12.FOCUS23795.
9
Carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) treatment approaches: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of transarterial and transvenous embolization for direct and indirect CCFs.颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)的治疗方法:经动脉和经静脉栓塞治疗直接和间接 CCF 的系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 May;204:106601. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106601. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
Embolization techniques of spontaneous direct carotid-cavernous fistulae: a single-center experience.自发性直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘的栓塞技术:单中心经验。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Sep;66(9):1625-1633. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03389-w. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Endovascular management of carotid-cavernous fistulas: a 16-year retrospective analysis of multimodal treatment strategies and long-term clinical outcomes.颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗:多模式治疗策略及长期临床结局的16年回顾性分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;16:1625899. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1625899. eCollection 2025.
2
Direct Carotid-Cavernous Fistula due to Aneurysmal Rupture with Residual Aortic Dissection Treated by Coil Embolization via Direct Puncture of the Common Carotid Artery: A Case Report.经颈总动脉直接穿刺行弹簧圈栓塞治疗动脉瘤破裂致残余主动脉夹层伴发的直接颈内动脉海绵窦瘘:一例报告
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2025-0061. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
3
Spontaneous Resolution of an Aggressive Direct Carotid Cavernous Fistula Following Partial Transvenous Embolization Treatment: A Case Report and Review of Literatures.经部分经静脉栓塞治疗后侵袭性直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘的自发消退:一例报告及文献复习
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 5;60(12):2011. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122011.
4
Endovascular approaches for the treatment of dural carotid-cavernous fistulas: A systematic review.血管内介入治疗硬脑膜型颈内动脉海绵窦瘘:一项系统评价
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 8:15910199241272595. doi: 10.1177/15910199241272595.
5
Endovascular and medical management strategies for carotid-cavernous fistulas: A safety and efficacy analysis.颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗与内科治疗策略:安全性与疗效分析
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun 17:15910199241261761. doi: 10.1177/15910199241261761.
6
Endovascular treatment of direct carotid cavernous fistula resulting from rupture of intracavernous carotid aneurysm: A case report.海绵窦内颈动脉瘤破裂导致的直接型颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Apr 16;12(11):1940-1946. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i11.1940.
7
Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with a Novel missense COL3A1 gene mutation present with bilateral spontaneous carotid-cavernous fistula: a case report.血管型埃勒斯-当洛斯综合征伴新型错义 COL3A1 基因突变致双侧自发性颈动脉海绵窦瘘:病例报告。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Dec;165(12):3799-3804. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05859-1. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Flow diversion for indirect carotid-cavernous fistula: Still an off-label indication?间接性颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的血流导向治疗:仍是一种超说明书用药适应证吗?
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Feb 24;14:65. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1113_2022. eCollection 2023.
9
Failure of tandem flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: Literature review and illustrative case.串联血流分流术治疗颅内动脉瘤失败:文献综述及病例说明
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Nov 11;13:518. doi: 10.25259/SNI_944_2022. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular Management of Direct Carotid-Cavernous Fistula: Evolution of Cost Effective Sandwich Technique.颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗:经济高效三明治技术的演变
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020 Oct;11(4):558-564. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714447. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Neuro-Endovascular Intervention in Traumatic Carotico-Cavernous Fistulae: A Single-Center Experience.创伤性颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的神经血管内介入治疗:单中心经验
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Oct 21;13:917-925. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S273603. eCollection 2020.
3
Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter.颅内血流导向装置置入后颅内动脉瘤迟发性破裂
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Dec;33(6):451-464. doi: 10.1177/1971400920953299. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Expanding Indications for Flow Diverters: Distal Aneurysms, Bifurcation Aneurysms, Small Aneurysms, Previously Coiled Aneurysms and Clipped Aneurysms, and Carotid Cavernous Fistulas.扩充血流导向装置的适应证:远隔部位动脉瘤、分叉部动脉瘤、小型动脉瘤、先前弹簧圈栓塞的动脉瘤和夹闭的动脉瘤,以及颈动脉海绵窦瘘。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(Suppl 1):S85-S94. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz334.
5
Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的作用机制和生物学特性。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(Suppl 1):S13-S19. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz324.
6
Endovascular therapy of direct dural carotid cavernous fistulas - A therapy assessment study including long-term follow-up patient interviews.直接硬脑膜颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗 - 包括长期随访患者访谈的治疗评估研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223488. eCollection 2019.
7
Flow diverters as a scaffold for treating direct carotid cavernous fistulas.血流导向装置作为治疗直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘的支架。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Nov;11(11):1129-1134. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014731. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Endovascular Treatment in Traumatic and Spontaneous Carotid Cavernous Fistulas: with Different Embolization Agents and via Various Vascular Routes.创伤性和自发性颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗:使用不同栓塞剂并通过各种血管途径
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2018 Nov;10(2):18-24.
9
Treatment of direct carotid-cavernous fistulas with flow diversion - does it work?采用血流导向治疗直接型颈内动脉海绵窦瘘——是否有效?
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Apr;25(2):135-138. doi: 10.1177/1591019918808468. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Ruptured Persistent Trigeminal Artery Causing Direct Cavernous Sinus Fistula Treated with Pipeline Embolization and Minimal Coiling.破裂性永存三叉动脉致直接海绵窦瘘,采用 Pipeline 栓塞和最小程度弹簧圈填塞治疗。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:471-475.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

采用血流导向装置治疗颈动脉海绵窦瘘。病例报告和系统评价。

Treatment of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas with flow diverters. A case report and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Center of Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (C.O.R.E.), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (C.I.R.I.), Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Feb;28(1):70-83. doi: 10.1177/15910199211014701. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.1177/15910199211014701
PMID:33966468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8905080/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare, usually follow head trauma or aneurysmal rupture. Recent treatment options include endovascular techniques such as flow diversion devices (FDDs).

OBJECTIVE

To present our case treated with FDD application with transarterial cavernous-sinus coiling and present a systematic review on the use and effectiveness of FDDs in CCF treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present our case of CCF treatment with FDD. A search was also conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane until November 2020. Reference lists were also cross-checked.

RESULTS

Including our case, thirty-eight patients were identified with a CCF that was treated with FDDs in sixteen studies. Twenty-two patients were females, nine were males and the rest unidentified. The mean age was 52,6 years (range 17-86, SD± 19.28). Thirty-six patients suffered from direct and two from indirect CCFs. Single FDD was used in four cases, single FDD with embolic materials in eleven cases, multiple overlapping FDDs were used in six cases and multiple overlapping FDDs with embolic materials were used in seventeen cases. Thirty-five patients (92,1%) had clinical improvement, immediate angiographic occlusion was seen in 44,7% of the cases, while long-term occlusion rate was 100% but with variable follow-up periods. One patient (2,6%) presented with a neurological deficit related to FDD deployment.

CONCLUSION

Targeted treatment of CCFs with single or overlapping FDDs with or without adjunct embolic agents offers a high success rate, both clinically and long-term angiographically compared to other endovascular methods alone. However, further research with multi-center prospective trials is warranted.

摘要

介绍

颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)很少见,通常继发于头部外伤或动脉瘤破裂。最近的治疗选择包括血管内技术,如血流导向装置(FDD)。

目的

介绍我们使用 FDD 治疗 CCF 的病例,并对 FDD 在 CCF 治疗中的应用和效果进行系统评价。

材料和方法

我们报告了一例使用 FDD 治疗 CCF 的病例,并在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 进行了检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 11 月。还交叉检查了参考文献列表。

结果

包括我们的病例在内,在 16 项研究中,有 38 例 CCF 患者使用 FDD 治疗。22 例为女性,9 例为男性,其余性别不详。平均年龄为 52.6 岁(范围 17-86,SD±19.28)。36 例患者为直接瘘,2 例为间接瘘。4 例使用单个 FDD,11 例使用单个 FDD 联合栓塞材料,6 例使用多个重叠 FDD,17 例使用多个重叠 FDD 联合栓塞材料。35 例(92.1%)患者临床症状改善,即刻血管造影闭塞率为 44.7%,长期闭塞率为 100%,但随访时间不同。1 例(2.6%)患者因 FDD 植入出现与神经功能相关的并发症。

结论

与其他单纯血管内方法相比,使用单个或重叠的 FDD 联合或不联合辅助栓塞剂治疗 CCF,在临床和长期血管造影方面均具有较高的成功率。然而,仍需要进行多中心前瞻性试验的进一步研究。