University of Kent, UK.
Autism. 2021 Nov;25(8):2418-2422. doi: 10.1177/13623613211012860. Epub 2021 May 9.
The way autistic individuals use language often gives the impression that they are not considering how much information listeners need in a given context. The same child can give too much information in one context (e.g. saying 'the big cup' with only one cup present) and too little information in another context (e.g. entering a room and announcing 'the red one' when the listener has no prior knowledge regarding what this refers to). We asked whether many autistic children particularly struggle to tailor their language appropriately in situations where this means changing how they have previously described something. That is, if a speaker has recently described an object as 'the cup', the need to switch to describing it as 'the big cup' could hinder the speaker's ability to use language in a context-appropriate way. We found that switching descriptions indeed makes it more difficult for children to use language in a context-appropriate way, but that this effect did not play out differently for autistic versus neuro-typical children. Autistic children were, however, less likely to provide a context-appropriate amount of information overall than were neuro-typical peers. The combination of these effects meant that when object re-description was required, autistic children only produced an appropriate description half the time. In contrast, without a requirement to re-describe, autistic children could indeed take listener informational needs into account. Applied professionals should consider whether a requirement to change the way the child has previously said something may hinder a child's ability to communicate effectively.
自闭症个体使用语言的方式常常给人一种印象,即他们不考虑听众在特定情境下需要多少信息。同一个孩子在一种情境下可能会提供过多的信息(例如,只有一个杯子在场时说“大杯子”),而在另一种情境下则提供过少的信息(例如,进入一个房间时,当听众对所指内容一无所知时,只说“红色的那个”)。我们想知道,是否有许多自闭症儿童在需要改变之前的描述方式来适当地调整语言时,会特别难以做到这一点。也就是说,如果一个说话者最近将一个物体描述为“杯子”,那么将其描述为“大杯子”的需求可能会阻碍说话者以适当的语境使用语言的能力。我们发现,切换描述确实会使儿童更难以以适当的语境使用语言,但这种效果在自闭症儿童和神经典型儿童之间没有表现出不同。然而,自闭症儿童总体上提供适当信息量的可能性却低于神经典型同龄人。这些影响的结合意味着,当需要重新描述物体时,自闭症儿童只有一半的时间会提供适当的描述。相比之下,如果不需要重新描述,自闭症儿童确实可以考虑到听众的信息需求。应用专业人员应该考虑是否需要改变孩子之前的说话方式会阻碍孩子有效沟通的能力。