School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Jul;168:112420. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112420. Epub 2021 May 8.
This study compared the community structure of macrobenthos in bare tidal areas and vegetated regions under two reclamation patterns, fully enclosed and opened reclamation, in Yangtze wetland, China. Compared with fully enclosed reclamation areas, opened reclamation areas had higher water salinity, higher number of species and abundance, and less disturbed habitat health status. Compared with bare tidal areas, vegetated regions were more suitable for the survival of macrobenthos and its habitat health status was more stable. Salinity, pH and larger soil particle diameter were positively associated with macrobenthic diversity, while total nitrogen and total phosphorus were negatively associated. Overall, compared with fully enclosed reclamation and vegetated regions, opened reclamation and bare tidal areas had less negative effects upon macrobenthic community and habitat health. Opened reclamation is preferred for wetland reclamation, and planting indigenous plants and releasing species adapted to fresh water is beneficial to the restoration of macrobenthic communities.
本研究比较了长江湿地两种围垦模式(全封闭围垦和开放式围垦)下光滩和植被区大型底栖动物的群落结构。与全封闭围垦区相比,开放式围垦区具有更高的水盐度、更多的物种和丰度,以及受干扰程度更小的生境健康状况。与光滩相比,植被区更适合大型底栖动物的生存,其生境健康状况更稳定。盐度、pH 值和较大的土壤粒径与大型底栖动物多样性呈正相关,而总氮和总磷与大型底栖动物多样性呈负相关。总的来说,与全封闭围垦和植被区相比,开放式围垦和光滩对大型底栖动物群落和生境健康的负面影响较小。开放式围垦更有利于湿地围垦,种植乡土植物和释放适应淡水的物种有利于大型底栖动物群落的恢复。