Ashokkumar Chethan, Rohan Vinayak, Kroemer Alexander H, Rao Sohail, Mazariegos George, Higgs Brandon W, Nadig Satish, Almeda Jose, Dhani Harmeet, Khan Khalid, Yazigi Nada, Ekong Udeme, Kaufman Stuart, Betancourt-Garcia Monica M, Mukund Kavitha, Sethi Pradeep, Mehrotra Shikhar, Soltys Kyle, Singh Manasi S, Bond Geoffrey, Khanna Ajai, Ningappa Mylarappa, Spishock Brianna, Sindhi Elizabeth, Atale Neha, Saunders Maggie, Baliga Prabhakar, Fishbein Thomas, Subramaniam Shankar, Sindhi Rakesh
bioRxiv. 2021 May 4:2021.05.03.442371. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.03.442371.
Assessment of T-cell immunity to the COVID-19 coronavirus requires reliable assays and is of great interest, given the uncertain longevity of the antibody response. Some recent reports have used immunodominant spike (S) antigenic peptides and anti-CD28 co-stimulation in varying combinations to assess T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2. These assays may cause T-cell hyperstimulation and could overestimate antiviral immunity in chronically immunosuppressed transplant recipients, who are predisposed to infections and vaccination failures. Here, we evaluate CD154-expressing T-cells induced by unselected S antigenic peptides in 204 subjects-103 COVID-19 patients and 101 healthy unexposed subjects. Subjects included 72 transplanted and 130 non-transplanted subjects. S-reactive CD154+T-cells co-express and can thus substitute for IFNγ (n=3). Assay reproducibility in a variety of conditions was acceptable with coefficient of variation of 2-10.6%. S-reactive CD154+T-cell frequencies were a) higher in 42 healthy unexposed transplant recipients who were sampled pre-pandemic, compared with 59 healthy non-transplanted subjects (p=0.02), b) lower in Tr COVID-19 patients compared with healthy transplant patients (p<0.0001), c) lower in Tr patients with severe COVID-19 (p<0.0001), or COVID-19 requiring hospitalization (p<0.05), compared with healthy Tr recipients. S-reactive T-cells were not significantly different between the various COVID-19 disease categories in NT recipients. Among transplant recipients with COVID-19, cytomegalovirus co-infection occurred in 34%; further, CMV-specific T-cells (p<0.001) and incidence of anti-receptor-binding-domain IgG (p=0.011) were lower compared with non-transplanted COVID-19 patients. Healthy unexposed transplant recipients exhibit pre-existing T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 infection leads to impaired T-cell and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 and increased risk of CMV co-infection in transplant recipients.
鉴于抗体反应的持续时间不确定,评估针对新冠病毒的T细胞免疫需要可靠的检测方法,这一点备受关注。最近的一些报告使用了免疫显性刺突(S)抗原肽和抗CD28共刺激的不同组合来评估针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的T细胞免疫。这些检测方法可能会导致T细胞过度刺激,并且可能高估慢性免疫抑制移植受者的抗病毒免疫力,这些受者易发生感染和疫苗接种失败。在此,我们评估了204名受试者(103名新冠患者和101名未接触过病毒的健康受试者)中未选择的S抗原肽诱导的表达CD154的T细胞。受试者包括72名移植受者和130名非移植受试者。S反应性CD154+T细胞共表达,因此可以替代干扰素γ(n=3)。在各种条件下检测的重现性是可接受的,变异系数为2%-10.6%。S反应性CD154+T细胞频率如下:a)与59名健康非移植受试者相比,42名在大流行前采样的未接触过病毒的健康移植受者中的频率更高(p=0.02);b)与健康移植患者相比,移植的新冠患者中的频率更低(p<0.0001);c)与健康移植受者相比,患有严重新冠(p<0.0001)或需要住院治疗的新冠(p<0.05)的移植患者中的频率更低。在非移植受者中,不同新冠疾病类别之间的S反应性T细胞没有显著差异。在患有新冠的移植受者中,34%发生了巨细胞病毒合并感染;此外,与未移植的新冠患者相比,巨细胞病毒特异性T细胞(p<0.001)和抗受体结合域IgG的发生率(p=0.011)更低。未接触过病毒的健康移植受者表现出对SARS-CoV-2的预先存在的T细胞免疫。新冠感染导致移植受者对SARS-CoV-2的T细胞和抗体反应受损,并增加了巨细胞病毒合并感染的风险。