• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心评估益生菌在艰难梭菌感染的一级预防中的应用。

A Multicenter Evaluation of Probiotic Use for the Primary Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;73(8):1330-1337. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab417.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciab417
PMID:33972996
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a priority for hospitals. Probiotics have the potential to interfere with colonization and CDI. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tool to prescribe probiotics for primary prevention of CDI among adult hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A CCDS tool was implemented into the electronic medical record at 4 hospitals to prompt prescription of a probiotic preparation at the time of antibiotic prescription in high-risk patients in May 2019. Interrupted time series using segmented regression analysis was conducted to evaluate hospital-wide CDI incidence for the year pre- and post-CCDS implementation. In addition, multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate CDI incidence in patients who qualified for probiotics in the pre- vs post-intervention periods, adjusting for potential confounders. To adjust for potential differences in patients who received probiotics in the post-intervention period, propensity score-matched pairs were developed to evaluate CDI risk by receipt of probiotics.

RESULTS

Quarterly CDI incidence increased over time post-intervention relative to baseline trends (slope change, 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], .9-1.9). The odds ratio (OR) of CDI was 1.41 in eligible patients post-intervention compared with pre-intervention (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.79). Propensity score-matched analysis showed that patients who received probiotics did not have lower rates of CDI compared with those who did not receive probiotics (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, .87-2.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of probiotics for primary prevention of CDI among adult inpatients receiving antibiotics is not supported.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的一级预防是医院的重点。益生菌具有干扰定植和 CDI 的潜力。在这项研究中,我们评估了计算机临床决策支持(CCDS)工具对成年住院患者中 CDI 一级预防抗生素处方中益生菌使用的影响。

方法

2019 年 5 月,在 4 家医院的电子病历中实施了 CCDS 工具,以在高危患者抗生素处方时提示开具益生菌制剂。采用分段回归分析对 CCDS 实施前后的医院范围内 CDI 发生率进行中断时间序列分析。此外,多变量逻辑回归用于评估符合益生菌条件的患者在干预前后的 CDI 发生率,调整潜在混杂因素。为了调整干预后接受益生菌的患者潜在差异,采用倾向评分匹配对来评估益生菌的接受情况对 CDI 风险的影响。

结果

与基线趋势相比,干预后每季度 CDI 发生率呈上升趋势(斜率变化,1.4;95%置信区间 [CI],.9-1.9)。与干预前相比,合格患者的 CDI 比值比(OR)为 1.41(调整后 OR,1.41;95% CI,1.11-1.79)。倾向评分匹配分析显示,接受益生菌的患者与未接受益生菌的患者相比,CDI 发生率并没有降低(OR,1.46;95% CI,.87-2.45)。

结论

在接受抗生素治疗的成年住院患者中,益生菌用于 CDI 的一级预防是不支持的。

相似文献

1
A Multicenter Evaluation of Probiotic Use for the Primary Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection.多中心评估益生菌在艰难梭菌感染的一级预防中的应用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;73(8):1330-1337. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab417.
2
The Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii Primary Prevention on Risk of Hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients Administered Antibiotics Frequently Associated With C. difficile Infection.布拉氏酵母菌预防治疗对频繁使用易致艰难梭菌感染抗生素的住院患者艰难梭菌医院感染发病率的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2512-e2518. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa808.
3
Effectiveness of Bio-K+ for the prevention of infection: Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial.Bio-K+ 预防感染的有效性: 递进式群组随机对照试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;45(4):443-451. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.169. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Effectiveness of Probiotic for Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Single-Center Before-and-After Quality Improvement Intervention at a Tertiary-Care Medical Center.益生菌对艰难梭菌感染一级预防的有效性:一家三级医疗中心的单中心前后质量改进干预。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):765-770. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.76. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
5
Implementation strategies for hospital-based probiotic administration in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design for preventing hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection.基于递进式整群随机试验设计的医院益生菌管理实施策略,以预防医院获得性艰难梭菌感染。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):1386. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10350-9.
6
Prescribed probiotic usage to prevent Clostridioides difficile infection among older patients receiving antibiotics: A retrospective cohort study.在接受抗生素治疗的老年患者中使用规定的益生菌预防艰难梭菌感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Infect Chemother. 2023 Sep;29(9):833-837. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 19.
7
Probiotics for primary prevention of infection: revisiting the evidence.益生菌用于预防原发性感染:重新审视证据。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Jun;39(6):889-891. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2205333. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Perils and pitfalls of probiotic quasi-experimental studies for primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection: A review of the evidence.益生菌预防艰难梭菌感染的准实验研究的风险和陷阱:对证据的综述。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Mar;49(3):375-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
9
The effect of probiotics on the incidence of Clostridioides difficile: Retrospective cohort analysis.益生菌对艰难梭菌感染发生率的影响:回顾性队列分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Feb;48(2):184-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.07.026. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Post-Discharge Infection after Arthroplasties in Poland, Infection Prevention and Control as the Key Element of Prevention of Infections.波兰关节置换术后的出院后感染,感染预防与控制作为预防感染的关键要素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063155.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential modulation of post-antibiotic colonization resistance to by two probiotic strains.两种益生菌菌株对抗生素后定植抗性的差异调节
mBio. 2025 Jul 21:e0146825. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01468-25.
2
Non-invasive treatment of infection with a human-origin probiotic cocktail through gut microbiome-gut metabolome modulations.通过肠道微生物组-肠道代谢组调节对人源益生菌鸡尾酒感染进行非侵入性治疗。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1555220. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1555220. eCollection 2025.
3
A Review of Therapies for Infection.感染治疗综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;14(1):17. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010017.
4
infection: history, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, clinical manifestations, treatment, and future options.感染:历史、流行病学、风险因素、预防、临床表现、治疗和未来选择。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0013523. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00135-23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
Gut Microbiota-Gut Metabolites and Infection: Approaching Sustainable Solutions for Therapy.肠道微生物群-肠道代谢产物与感染:寻求可持续的治疗解决方案
Metabolites. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):74. doi: 10.3390/metabo14010074.
6
Host Immune Responses to Infection and Potential Novel Therapeutic Approaches.宿主对感染的免疫反应及潜在的新型治疗方法。
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 23;8(12):506. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8120506.
7
Unveiling the inhibition mechanism of by multiomics approach.通过多组学方法揭示[具体物质]的抑制机制。 (你提供的原文中“by”后面应该有具体物质,这里翻译根据常见表述补充了“[具体物质]”,以使译文更完整通顺)
Front Microbiol. 2023 Nov 8;14:1293149. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1293149. eCollection 2023.
8
Lactobacillus rhamnosus a cause of Gram-positive rods bacteremia after prophylactic probiotic consumption.鼠李糖乳杆菌是预防性食用益生菌后革兰氏阳性杆菌血症的一个病因。
New Microbes New Infect. 2023 Sep 11;54:101177. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101177. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
infection in a skilled nursing facility (SNF): cost savings of an automated, standardized probiotic antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) policy.熟练护理机构(SNF)中的感染:自动化、标准化益生菌抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)政策的成本节约
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Sep 6;5(5):dlad102. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad102. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Controversies in the Prevention and Treatment of Infection in Adults: A Narrative Review.成人感染预防与治疗中的争议:一篇叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 3;11(2):387. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020387.