Burgon Clare, Goldberg Sarah Elizabeth, van der Wardt Veronika, Brewin Catherine, Harwood Rowan H
School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(2):111-123. doi: 10.1159/000515678. Epub 2021 May 11.
Apathy is highly prevalent in dementia and is also seen in mild cognitive impairment and the general population. Apathy contributes to failure to undertake daily activities and can lead to health problems or crises. It is therefore important to assess apathy. However, there is currently no gold standard measure of apathy. A comprehensive systematic review of the measurement properties of apathy scales is required.
A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018094390). MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for studies that aimed to develop or assess the validity or reliability of an apathy scale in participants over 65 years, living in the community. A systematic review was conducted in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments procedure for reviewing patient-reported outcome measures. The studies' risk of bias was assessed, and all relevant measurement properties were assessed for quality. Results were pooled and rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation procedure.
Fifty-seven publications regarding 18 measures and 39 variations met the eligibility criteria. The methodological quality of individual studies ranged from inadequate to very good and measurement properties ranged from insufficient to sufficient. Similarly, the overall evidence for measurement properties ranged from very low to high quality. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) had sufficient content validity, reliability, construct validity, and where applicable, structural validity and internal consistency.
Numerous scales are available to assess apathy, with varying psychometric properties. The AES and LARS are recommended for measuring apathy in older adults and people living with dementia. The apathy dimension of the commonly used Neuropsychiatric Inventory should be limited to screening for apathy.
淡漠在痴呆症中非常普遍,在轻度认知障碍和普通人群中也可见。淡漠会导致无法进行日常活动,并可能引发健康问题或危机。因此,评估淡漠很重要。然而,目前尚无评估淡漠的金标准方法。需要对淡漠量表的测量特性进行全面系统的综述。
在PROSPERO(ID:CRD42018094390)注册了一项系统综述。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和CINAHL,以查找旨在开发或评估65岁以上社区居民淡漠量表的有效性或可靠性的研究。根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准程序,对患者报告的结局指标进行系统综述。评估了研究的偏倚风险,并对所有相关测量特性的质量进行了评估。结果采用改良的推荐分级评估、发展和评价程序进行汇总和评级。
57篇关于18种测量方法和39种变体的出版物符合纳入标准。个别研究的方法学质量从不足到非常好不等,测量特性从不足到充分不等。同样,测量特性的总体证据质量从非常低到高不等。淡漠评估量表(AES)和里尔淡漠评定量表(LARS)具有足够的内容效度、信度、结构效度,以及适用时的结构效度和内部一致性。
有多种量表可用于评估淡漠,其心理测量特性各不相同。推荐使用AES和LARS来测量老年人和痴呆症患者的淡漠。常用的神经精神科问卷中的淡漠维度应仅限于淡漠筛查。