Chen Rong, Lu Fang-Ying, Liu Bing, Huang Jingwen, Zhou Min, Dai Ranran, Guo Yi
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 May 3;13:3619-3627. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S307368. eCollection 2021.
Anlotinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits tumor angiogenesis and cell proliferation. It is widely used as a third-line therapy for lung cancer. However, reliable prognostic biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anlotinib are lacking. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the prognostic value of serological inflammatory biomarkers in anlotinib treatment.
Patients with advanced lung cancer treated with anlotinib monotherapy were enrolled. Cox regression was conducted to analyze the significant factors related to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The objective response rate (ORR) was compared based on the median cut-off value of the significant inflammation index. Meanwhile, we created survival curves to compare the two groups and performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to assess the predictive ability of the inflammation index.
Among a total of 71 patients, the median PFS was 5.5 months and the median OS was 9.5 months. The ORR and disease control rate were 16.9% and 84.5%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was the only indicator associated with both PFS (hazard ratio [HR] =1.095, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.030-1.163, P=0.003) and OS (HR=1.057, 95% CI 1.003-1.113, P=0.037). In the group with ANC ≥4.58, the ORR was relatively lower (8.1% vs 26.5%, P=0.057), but not statistically significant; PFS and OS were relatively shorter (median PFS 5.0 [95% CI 4.4-9.6] vs 7.0 months [95% CI 4.4-5.7], P=0.024 and median OS 7.3 [95% CI 4.7-10.0] vs 17.6 months [95% CI 12.3-22.9], P < 0.001). ANC had a relatively high discriminatory ability to predict 10-month survival, with an area under the curve of 0.729, sensitivity of 82.5%, and specificity of 67.7%.
Elevated pre-treatment ANC was associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with lower peripheral blood levels of ANC might benefit from anlotinib.
安罗替尼是一种多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,可抑制肿瘤血管生成和细胞增殖。它被广泛用作肺癌的三线治疗药物。然而,缺乏可靠的预后生物标志物来预测安罗替尼的疗效。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以探讨血清学炎症生物标志物在安罗替尼治疗中的预后价值。
纳入接受安罗替尼单药治疗的晚期肺癌患者。采用Cox回归分析与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相关的显著因素。根据显著炎症指标的中位数截断值比较客观缓解率(ORR)。同时,我们绘制生存曲线以比较两组,并进行受试者工作特征曲线分析以评估炎症指标的预测能力。
在总共71例患者中,中位PFS为5.5个月,中位OS为9.5个月。ORR和疾病控制率分别为16.9%和84.5%。根据单因素和多因素分析,绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)是唯一与PFS(风险比[HR]=1.095,95%置信区间[CI]1.030-1.163,P=0.003)和OS(HR=1.057,95%CI1.003-1.113,P=0.037)均相关的指标。在ANC≥4.58的组中,ORR相对较低(8.1%对26.5%,P=0.057),但无统计学意义;PFS和OS相对较短(中位PFS5.0[95%CI4.4-9.6]对7.0个月[95%CI4.4-5.7],P=0.024,中位OS7.3[95%CI4.7-10.0]对17.6个月[95%CI12.3-22.9],P<0.001)。ANC对预测10个月生存期具有相对较高的判别能力,曲线下面积为0.729,敏感性为82.5%,特异性为67.7%。
治疗前ANC升高与预后不良相关。外周血ANC水平较低的患者可能从安罗替尼治疗中获益。