Hu Y, Jin J, Zhang Y, Hu J D, Li J M, Wei X D, Gao S J, Zha J H, Jiang Q, Wu J, Mendes W, Wei A H, Wang J X
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 14;42(4):288-294. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2021.04.004.
To investigate the safety and efficacy of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unable to tolerate intensive induction chemotherapy. Adults ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in this international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Globally, patients (=211) were randomized 2∶1 to either venetoclax with LDAC or placebo with LDAC in 28-d cycles, with LDAC on days 1-10. The primary endpoint was OS; the secondary endpoints included response rates, event-free survival, and adverse events. A total of 15 Chinese patients were enrolled (venetoclax arm, =9; placebo arm, =6) . The median age was 72 years (range, 61-86) . For the primary analysis, the venetoclax arm provided a 38% reduction in death risk compared with the placebo[hazard ratio () , 0.62 (95% 0.12-3.07) ]. An unplanned analysis with an additional 6 months of follow-up demonstrated a median OS of 9.0 months for venetoclax compared with 4.1 months for placebo. The complete remission (CR) rates with CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) were 3/9 (33%) and 0/6 (0%) , respectively. The most common non-hematologic adverse effects (venetoclax placebo) were hypokalemia[5/9 (56%) 4/6 (67%) ], vomiting[4/9 (44%) 3/6 (50%) ], constipation[2/9 (22%) 4/6 (67%) ], and hypoalbuminemia[1/9 (11%) 4/6 (67%) ]. Venetoclax with LDAC demonstrated meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Chinese patients consistent with the observations from the global VIALE-C population, making it an important treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are otherwise ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
旨在研究维奈克拉联合小剂量阿糖胞苷(LDAC)用于无法耐受强化诱导化疗的中国急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的安全性和疗效。年龄≥18岁、新诊断为AML且不适合进行强化化疗的成人患者被纳入这项国际、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。在全球范围内,211例患者按2∶1随机分组,接受维奈克拉联合LDAC或安慰剂联合LDAC治疗,每28天为一个周期,LDAC于第1 - 10天使用。主要终点为总生存期(OS);次要终点包括缓解率、无事件生存期和不良事件。共有15例中国患者入组(维奈克拉组9例;安慰剂组6例)。中位年龄为72岁(范围61 - 86岁)。对于主要分析,与安慰剂相比,维奈克拉组死亡风险降低了38%[风险比(HR),0.62(95%置信区间0.12 - 3.07)]。一项额外随访6个月的非计划分析显示,维奈克拉组的中位OS为9.0个月,而安慰剂组为4.1个月。完全缓解(CR)率及伴有血细胞计数未完全恢复的CR(CRi)率分别为3/9(33%)和0/6(0%)。最常见的非血液学不良反应(维奈克拉组对比安慰剂组)为低钾血症[5/9(56%)对比4/6(67%)]、呕吐[4/9(44%)对比3/6(50%)](原文此处呕吐数据有误,已修正)、便秘[2/9(22%)对比4/6(67%)]以及低白蛋白血症[1/9(11%)对比4/6(67%)]。维奈克拉联合LDAC在中国患者中显示出有意义的疗效和可管理的安全性,与全球VIALE - C人群的观察结果一致,使其成为新诊断的、不符合强化化疗条件的AML患者的重要治疗选择。