The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Transplantation. 2022 Jan 1;106(1):117-128. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003682.
Severe allograft dysfunction, as opposed to the expected immediate function, following liver transplantation is a major complication, and the clinical manifestations of such that lead to either immediate retransplant or death are the catastrophic end of the spectrum. Primary nonfunction (PNF) has declined in incidence over the years, yet the impact on patient and healthcare teams, and the burden on the organ pool in case of the need for retransplant should not be underestimated. There is no universal test to define the diagnosis of PNF, and current criteria are based on various biochemical parameters surrogate of liver function; moreover, a disparity remains within different healthcare systems on selecting candidates eligible for urgent retransplantation. The impact on PNF from traditionally accepted risk factors has changed somewhat, mainly driven by the rising demand for organs, combined with the concerted approach by clinicians on the in-depth understanding of PNF, optimal graft recipient selection, mitigation of the clinical environment in which a marginal graft is reperfused, and postoperative management. Regardless of the mode, available data suggest machine perfusion strategies help reduce the incidence further but do not completely avert the risk of PNF. The mainstay of management relies on identifying severe allograft dysfunction at a very early stage and aggressive management, while excluding other identifiable causes that mimic severe organ dysfunction. This approach may help salvage some grafts by preventing total graft failure and also maintaining a patient in an optimal physiological state if retransplantation is considered the ultimate patient salvage strategy.
肝移植后严重的移植物功能障碍(与预期的即刻功能相反)是一种主要并发症,导致即刻再次移植或死亡的临床表现是其灾难性的结局。近年来,原发性无功能(PNF)的发病率有所下降,但对患者和医疗团队的影响,以及在需要再次移植的情况下对器官库的负担不应被低估。目前尚无通用的测试方法来定义 PNF 的诊断,现有的标准是基于各种生化参数来替代肝功能;此外,不同的医疗体系在选择适合紧急再次移植的患者方面仍存在差异。传统上被认为是 PNF 的风险因素的影响已经发生了一些变化,主要是由于对器官的需求不断增加,再加上临床医生对 PNF 的深入了解、对合适的移植受者的选择、减轻边缘供体再灌注时的临床环境以及术后管理方面的协调一致的方法。无论采用哪种模式,现有数据表明,机器灌注策略有助于进一步降低 PNF 的发生率,但并不能完全消除 PNF 的风险。管理的主要方法是在早期识别严重的移植物功能障碍,并进行积极的管理,同时排除其他类似严重器官功能障碍的可识别原因。这种方法有助于通过防止移植物完全衰竭来挽救一些移植物,并在考虑再次移植作为最终患者挽救策略时,使患者保持最佳生理状态。