Suppr超能文献

背景和设计:心力衰竭(COACH)试验结局和医疗服务可及性比较的研究:一项阶梯式楔形群随机试验。

Rationale and design of the comparison of outcomes and access to care for heart failure (COACH) trial: A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

ICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre of the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute and Unity Health, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2021 Oct;240:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is an ambulatory care sensitive condition and a leading reason for emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Improved decision-making and care may enhance safety and efficiency for patients presenting to the ED with acute HF.

OBJECTIVES

We will evaluate an intervention comprised of 2 complementary components: (1) the Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade simultaneous 7- and 30-day (EHMRG30-ST) risk scores, which will inform admission-discharge decisions, and (2) a rapid outpatient follow-up (RAPID-HF) clinic for low-to-intermediate risk patients on cardiovascular readmissions or death.

STUDY DESIGN

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial with cross-sectional measurement at 10 acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Patients presenting during control and intervention periods are eligible if they have a primary ED diagnosis of HF. In the intervention periods, access to the EHMRG30-ST web calculator will become available to hospitals' internet protocol (IP) addresses, and referral to the RAPID-HF clinic will be facilitated by a study nurse navigator. Patients with a high risk EHMRG30-ST score will be admitted to hospital. The RAPID-HF clinic will accept referrals for patients: (1) with low risk 7- and 30-day EHMRG30-ST scores who are discharged directly from the ED, or (2) intermediate risk patients with hospital length of stay < 72 hours. The RAPID-HF clinic, staffed by a nurse-clinician and cardiologist, will provide care during the 30-day transition after hospital separation.

CONCLUSION

This trial will determine whether novel risk stratification coupled with rapid ambulatory care achieves better outcomes than conventional decision-making and care for patients with HF.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)是一种门诊医疗敏感病症,也是导致急诊部门(ED)就诊和住院的主要原因。改进决策和护理可以提高 ED 急性 HF 患者的安全性和效率。

目的

我们将评估一种干预措施,该措施由两个互补部分组成:(1)急诊心力衰竭死亡率风险等级 30 天(EHMRG30-ST)风险评分,该评分将用于入院-出院决策;(2)心血管再入院或死亡的低至中危患者的快速门诊随访(RAPID-HF)诊所。

研究设计

在加拿大安大略省的 10 家急性护理医院进行的阶梯式楔形集群随机试验,具有横断面测量。如果患者的主要 ED 诊断为 HF,则在对照和干预期间均符合条件。在干预期间,医院的互联网协议(IP)地址将可以访问 EHMRG30-ST 网络计算器,并且研究护士导航员将促进向 RAPID-HF 诊所转介。EHMRG30-ST 评分高风险的患者将住院。RAPID-HF 诊所将接受以下患者的转介:(1)ED 直接出院的低风险 7 天和 30 天 EHMRG30-ST 评分患者,或(2)住院时间<72 小时的中危患者。RAPID-HF 诊所由护士-临床医生和心脏病专家组成,将在患者出院后的 30 天过渡期内提供护理。

结论

该试验将确定新的风险分层加上快速门诊护理是否比 HF 患者的常规决策和护理能带来更好的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验