Bordewijk Esmée M, Li Wentao, Gurrin Lyle C, Thornton Jim G, van Wely Madelon, Mol Ben W
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
In 2019, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) authored by Dr. Ismail was retracted due to concerns about data integrity. Since there are no policies in place to investigate other publications of authors of retracted studies, we investigated Dr. Ismail's other trials.
We searched for RCTs authored by Dr. Ismail. We made pairwise comparisons of values in baseline and outcome tables between trials. We assessed whether the distributions of baseline characteristics were compatible with properly conducted randomization, using Monte Carlo simulations and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We read the publications carefully for unusual features.
Dr. Ismail was author in eight published and one unpublished trial. In three of his first author studies we found multiple identical values in the baseline and/or outcome tables from different trials. At least some of the trials were unlikely to have followed a proper randomization process. There were a number of other unusual features in the papers we reviewed.
It is probable that other trials published by Dr. Ismail contain questionable data. We call for a thorough investigation of the original trial data and related official documents. Our exercise suggests that the practice to assess research integrity should include all publications of authors with retracted fabricated articles.
2019年,伊斯梅尔博士撰写的一项随机对照试验(RCT)因数据完整性问题被撤回。由于没有相关政策对被撤回研究的作者的其他出版物进行调查,我们对伊斯梅尔博士的其他试验进行了调查。
我们搜索了伊斯梅尔博士撰写的随机对照试验。我们对各试验基线表和结果表中的数值进行了两两比较。我们使用蒙特卡洛模拟和柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验评估基线特征的分布是否与正确进行的随机化兼容。我们仔细阅读这些出版物以寻找异常特征。
伊斯梅尔博士是八项已发表试验和一项未发表试验的作者。在他作为第一作者的三项研究中,我们在不同试验的基线表和/或结果表中发现了多个相同的数值。至少部分试验不太可能遵循了正确的随机化过程。我们审查的论文中还有许多其他异常特征。
伊斯梅尔博士发表的其他试验很可能包含有问题的数据。我们呼吁对原始试验数据和相关官方文件进行全面调查。我们的研究表明,评估研究诚信的做法应包括对发表过被撤回造假文章的作者的所有出版物进行审查。