Bindra Jas, Chopra Ishveen, Niewoehner John, Panaccio Mary, Wan George J
Falcon Research Group, North Potomac, MD, USA.
Manticore Consultancy, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 May 6;13:349-358. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S304600. eCollection 2021.
Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often have inadequately controlled symptoms and are unable to achieve remission or low disease activity despite aggressive treatment. This results in irreversible joint damage, adversely affecting patients' physical and social functioning. The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of repository corticotropin injection (RCI) versus standard of care (SoC) in patients with active RA from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over two to three years.
An individual-level microsimulation was developed to generate individual trajectories for patients with RA, using data from a published Phase 4 trial of RCI. These trajectories report a patient's disease pathway and associated cost and quality-of-life outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RCI versus SoC was assessed using the literature-derived direct medical and indirect costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) derived from a Phase 4 trial of RCI. The uncertainty in base case estimates of the parameters was evaluated in the sensitivity analysis.
Over two years, RCI has an incremental QALY gain of 1.591 and incremental cost of $183,965 and $117,443 from payer and societal perspective, respectively, resulting in an ICER of $115,629/QALY and $73,817/QALY compared to SoC. Over three years, RCI has an incremental QALY gain of 2.336 and incremental cost of $202,315 and $104,506 from payer and societal perspective, respectively, resulting in an ICER of $86,607/QALY and $44,737/QALY compared to SoC. Results from the probabilistic sensitivity analysis are consistent with those of the base case model.
RCI is a cost-effective strategy for patients with persistently active RA who are previously treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids compared to SoC over two to three years from the payer and societal perspectives at a US willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. Further, the economic benefit of RCI is realized with improvement in a patient's clinical and health outcomes.
活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的症状往往控制不佳,尽管接受了积极治疗,仍无法实现缓解或达到低疾病活动度。这会导致不可逆转的关节损伤,对患者的身体和社会功能产生不利影响。目的是从美国支付方和社会角度评估长效促肾上腺皮质激素注射(RCI)与标准治疗(SoC)相比在两到三年内对活动性RA患者的成本效益。
利用已发表的RCI 4期试验数据,开发了一个个体水平的微观模拟模型,以生成RA患者的个体病程。这些病程报告了患者的疾病路径以及相关的成本和生活质量结果。使用文献得出的直接医疗和间接成本,以及从RCI 4期试验得出的质量调整生命年(QALY),评估RCI与SoC的增量成本效益比(ICER)。在敏感性分析中评估了参数基础病例估计中的不确定性。
在两年时间里,从支付方和社会角度来看,RCI的增量QALY增益分别为1.591,增量成本分别为183,965美元和117,443美元,与SoC相比,ICER分别为115,629美元/QALY和73,817美元/QALY。在三年时间里,从支付方和社会角度来看,RCI的增量QALY增益分别为2.336,增量成本分别为202,315美元和104,506美元,与SoC相比,ICER分别为86,607美元/QALY和44,737美元/QALY。概率敏感性分析的结果与基础病例模型的结果一致。
从支付方和社会角度来看,在美国每QALY支付意愿阈值为150,000美元的情况下,与SoC相比,对于先前接受过改善病情抗风湿药物和皮质类固醇治疗的持续性活动性RA患者,RCI在两到三年内是一种具有成本效益的策略。此外,RCI的经济效益随着患者临床和健康结果的改善而实现。