Laboratório de Neuropsicofarmacologia, Serviço de Psiquiatria do Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Saúde, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Laboratório de Neuropsicofarmacologia, Serviço de Psiquiatria do Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:576-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 8.
Dissociative symptoms are common, possibly severe, side effects associated with the use of ketamine and esketamine in depression. We investigated the relationship between trait dissociation and dissociation induced by ketamine and esketamine used as augmentation therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Adults with TRD were randomly assigned to receive a single intravenous infusion, with a duration of 40 min, of either esketamine 0.25 mg/kg or ketamine 0.5 mg/kg. We assessed trait dissociation with the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES) and, to evaluate induced dissociation, the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) was used. Thirty-two subjects received esketamine and 29 received ketamine. The groups had similar median DES scores (p = 0.26). More than 30% of the patients in both groups had DES scores ≥30 points. The median CADSS score in the esketamine group was equivalent to that in the ketamine group (p = 0.40). Every 5 points increment in the DES was associated with a 10.9% (95% CI 4.5-17.8%) increase in the CADSS, in an exponential fashion when the two groups were pooled together. Subjects with high trait dissociation had a higher risk of induced dissociation state (relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) and very high induced dissociation (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.14-8.15). Induced dissociation was not a serious adverse effect. The findings suggest that trait dissociation is a predictor of induced dissociation by Ketamine or Esketamine in TRD subjects. Screening for trait dissociation and counseling patients with high trait dissociation on the risks of dissociation by these drugs are recommended.
分离症状是使用氯胺酮和依他佐辛治疗抑郁症时常见的、可能严重的副作用。我们研究了特质分离与氯胺酮和依他佐辛诱导的分离之间的关系,氯胺酮和依他佐辛被用作治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)的增效治疗。TRD 成人患者被随机分配接受单次静脉输注,持续 40 分钟,分别给予依他佐辛 0.25mg/kg 或氯胺酮 0.5mg/kg。我们使用分离体验量表(DES)评估特质分离,使用临床管理的分离状态量表(CADSS)评估诱导分离。32 名患者接受依他佐辛治疗,29 名患者接受氯胺酮治疗。两组的 DES 中位数评分相似(p=0.26)。两组中有超过 30%的患者 DES 评分≥30 分。依他佐辛组的 CADSS 中位数评分与氯胺酮组相当(p=0.40)。DES 每增加 5 分,CADSS 就会增加 10.9%(95%CI 4.5-17.8%),当两组合并时呈指数增长。特质分离程度高的患者更有可能出现诱导性分离状态(相对风险 [RR] 1.41,95%CI 1.11-1.78)和非常高的诱导性分离(RR 3.05,95%CI 1.14-8.15)。诱导性分离不是严重的不良事件。这些发现表明,特质分离是 TRD 患者使用氯胺酮或依他佐辛诱导分离的预测因子。建议对特质分离进行筛查,并对特质分离程度高的患者进行关于这些药物引起分离风险的咨询。