Carl T Hayden Veterans Medical Center, 650 E Indian School Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85012, USA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4310 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, 1335 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:598-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 8.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has gained interest over the past two decades. However, it has yet to be recommended in major treatment guidelines. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to examine the efficacy of rTMS for PTSD. Thirteen studies with 549 participants were included in this review. We compared the effects of (1) rTMS versus sham, and (2) high-frequency (HF) versus low-frequency (LF) rTMS, on posttreatment PTSD scores and other secondary outcomes. We calculated the standardized mean differences (SMD) to determine the direction of effects, and unstandardized mean differences to estimate the magnitude of efficacy. At post-treatment, rTMS was superior to sham comparison in reducing PTSD (SMD = -1.13, 95% CI: -2.10 to -0.15) and depression severity (SMD = -0.83, 95% CI: -1.30 to -0.36). The quality of evidence, however, was rated very low due to small samples sizes, treatment heterogeneity, inconsistent results, and an imprecise pooled effect. HF rTMS was associated with slightly improved, albeit imprecise, outcomes compared to LF rTMS on PTSD (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI: -1.39 to 1.00) and depression (SMD = -1.09, 95% CI: -1.65 to -0.52) severity. Further research is required to advance the evidence on this treatment.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的一种治疗方法,在过去二十年中引起了人们的关注。然而,它尚未被主要治疗指南推荐。我们进行了一项系统评价,以检查 rTMS 治疗 PTSD 的疗效。这项综述纳入了 13 项研究,共 549 名参与者。我们比较了(1)rTMS 与假刺激,以及(2)高频(HF)rTMS 与低频(LF)rTMS,对治疗后 PTSD 评分和其他次要结局的影响。我们计算了标准化均数差(SMD)以确定效应方向,并估计了疗效的大小。在治疗后,rTMS 与假刺激相比,在降低 PTSD(SMD=-1.13,95%CI:-2.10 至-0.15)和抑郁严重程度(SMD=-0.83,95%CI:-1.30 至-0.36)方面更具优势。然而,由于样本量小、治疗异质性、结果不一致和汇总效果不精确,证据质量被评为非常低。与 LF rTMS 相比,HF rTMS 与 PTSD(SMD=-0.19,95%CI:-1.39 至 1.00)和抑郁(SMD=-1.09,95%CI:-1.65 至-0.52)严重程度的改善结果稍好,但不精确。需要进一步研究来推进这种治疗方法的证据。