• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹带在减轻剖宫产术后疼痛和不适中的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The efficacy of abdominal binders in reducing postoperative pain and distress after cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jul;262:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.014
PMID:33993065
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of abdominal binders in reducing postoperative pain, patient distress and surgical postoperative sequelae after cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

A comprehensive search in electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central) was performed up to February 2021. Selection criteria included randomized clinical trials investigating the application or not of abdominal binder after CD. The primary outcome was postoperative pain, measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were divided into short- and long-term postoperative outcomes, including patient distress, need for additional pain medications, time to mobilization, return to normal daily activities, surgical site infection, fascial dehiscence or incisional hernia, and rectus abdominis diastasis. The summary measures were reported as mean difference with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. An I (Higgins I) value of greater than 0% was used to identify heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 601 women were included for meta-analysis: 310 (51.6 %) were randomized to the abdominal binder and 291 (48.4 %) to no abdominal binder group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for VAS score either at 24 h (MD -0.97, 95 % CI -2.23 to 0.30; p = 0.13) and at 48 h (MD -0.30, 95 % CI -0.71 to 0.11; p = 0.15). Conversely, there was a significant reduction in postoperative distress (SDS) both at 24 h (MD -2.23, 95 % CI -3.77 to -0.70; p = 0.004) and 48 h (MD -2.37, 95 % CI -3.86 to -0.87; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis shows that the use of abdominal binders after CD significantly reduces patient distress.

摘要

目的

评估腹部束带在减轻剖宫产(CD)术后疼痛、患者痛苦和手术后遗症方面的疗效。

方法

对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中央数据库进行全面检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 2 月。纳入标准为研究腹部束带在 CD 后应用或不应用的随机临床试验。主要结局为使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量的术后疼痛。次要结局分为短期和长期术后结局,包括患者痛苦、需要额外的止痛药、开始活动的时间、恢复正常日常活动、手术部位感染、筋膜裂开或切口疝、腹直肌分离。汇总措施以随机效应模型的 DerSimonian 和 Laird 表示为均数差和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Higgins I 值大于 0%来识别异质性。

结果

纳入了 4 项 RCT,共 601 名女性进行荟萃分析:310 名(51.6%)被随机分配到腹部束带组,291 名(48.4%)分到无腹部束带组。两组在 24 小时(MD-0.97,95%CI-2.23 至 0.30;p=0.13)和 48 小时(MD-0.30,95%CI-0.71 至 0.11;p=0.15)的 VAS 评分上无统计学差异。相反,术后疼痛评分(SDS)在 24 小时(MD-2.23,95%CI-3.77 至-0.70;p=0.004)和 48 小时(MD-2.37,95%CI-3.86 至-0.87;p=0.002)均显著降低。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,CD 后使用腹部束带可显著减轻患者的痛苦。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of abdominal binders in reducing postoperative pain and distress after cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹带在减轻剖宫产术后疼痛和不适中的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jul;262:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 9.
2
The effectiveness of the abdominal binder in relieving pain after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹带在剖宫产术后缓解疼痛的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;154(1):7-16. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13607. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
3
Randomized controlled trial of abdominal binders for postoperative pain, distress, and blood loss after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后使用腹带对疼痛、不适及失血影响的随机对照试验
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;137(3):271-276. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12134. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
A randomized controlled trial of abdominal binders for the management of postoperative pain and distress after cesarean delivery.一项关于腹部束带用于剖宫产术后疼痛及不适管理的随机对照试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 May;133(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.026. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
5
Perioperative gabapentin and post cesarean pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.围手术期加巴喷丁与剖宫产术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on wound complications after cesarean delivery in women with obesity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性负压伤口治疗对肥胖女性剖宫产术后伤口并发症的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 May;4(3):100617. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100617. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
7
Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).Cochrane系统评价:渗透性和刺激性泻药用于儿童便秘管理(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):57-109. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1893.
8
Impact of Ketamine on Pain Management in Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氯胺酮对剖宫产疼痛管理的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2020 Mar;23(2):135-148.
9
Transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for post-cesarean section analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹横肌平面阻滞与切口浸润用于剖宫产术后镇痛的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;153(3):383-392. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13563. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
The effect of music on anxiety in women undergoing cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.音乐对剖宫产产妇焦虑的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Sep;3(5):100435. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100435. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Non-surgical Treatments with or without Exercise for Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Postpartum Women: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.产后妇女腹直肌分离非手术治疗联合或不联合运动的比较疗效及可接受性:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):937-951. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02179-5. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Is There a Clinical Benefit of Abdominal Binders After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.腹部手术后使用腹带是否具有临床益处:一项系统文献综述
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Oct 17;3:13506. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13506. eCollection 2024.