• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝不当引用的权利:重新思考围绕引用的科学文化。

The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation.

作者信息

Teixeira da Silva Jaime A, Vuong Quan-Hoang

机构信息

Independent researcher, Ikenobe 3011-2, P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho, Kagawa-ken 761-0799 Japan.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Ha Dong District, Hanoi 100803 Viet Nam.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5355-5360. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03960-9. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-021-03960-9
PMID:33994602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8105147/
Abstract

Logically, and by most common standards, academics would be pleased to be cited, considering it a form of recognition of their intellect. In return, especially those with high citation counts, such as Clarivate Analytics' Highly Cited Researchers, can benefit through peer recognition, rewards, funding, securing a better position, or expanding a collaborative network. Despite known and untold benefits, one issue has not been discussed: the right to refuse to be cited or the right to refuse a citation. Academics might not want to be cited by papers published in truly predatory journals, papers with false authors, or sting papers with falsified elements that employ underhanded ethical tactics. Currently, academics generally have the freedom to select where they publish their findings and choose studies they cite, so it is highly probable that requests to remove citations or refuse citations might never become formal publishing policy. Nonetheless, this academic discussion is worth having as valid and invalid literature increasingly gets mixed through citations, and as the grey zone between predatory/non-predatory and scholarly/unscholarly becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish.

摘要

从逻辑上讲,按照大多数普遍标准,学者们会乐于被引用,将其视为对自身学识的一种认可形式。作为回报,尤其是那些被引用次数较高的学者,比如科睿唯安的高被引研究者,能够通过同行认可、奖励、资金支持、获得更好的职位或者拓展合作网络而受益。尽管有诸多已知和未知的益处,但有一个问题尚未被讨论:拒绝被引用的权利或拒绝引用的权利。学者们可能不想被发表在真正的掠夺性期刊上的论文、有虚假作者的论文或者采用不正当道德手段且包含伪造内容的恶意论文引用。目前,学者们通常有自由选择在哪里发表他们的研究成果以及选择他们所引用的研究,所以要求删除引用或拒绝引用的请求很可能永远不会成为正式的出版政策。尽管如此,随着有效文献和无效文献通过引用越来越多地混在一起,以及掠夺性/非掠夺性和学术性/非学术性之间的灰色地带越来越难以区分,这场学术讨论是值得进行的。