• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大型会议环境下的无生命模拟训练模型中对腹腔镜检查和软性输尿管镜检查任务的验证。

Validation of laparoscopy and flexible ureteroscopy tasks in inanimate simulation training models at a large-scale conference setting.

作者信息

Lu Jirong, Thandapani Karthik, Kuo Tricia, Tiong Ho Yee

机构信息

Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore.

Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian J Urol. 2021 Apr;8(2):215-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.001
PMID:33996479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8099649/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Simulation based training with training models is being increasingly used as a tool to help trainees mount the learning curve. However, validation studies of surgical simulators are often limited by small numbers. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of validating simulation-training tasks in laparoscopy and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) rapidly at a large-scale conference setting for residents.

METHODS

Seventy-six urology residents from various Asian countries were assessed on their laparoscopic and FURS skills during the 14th Urological Association of Asia Congress 2016. Residents performed the peg transfer task from the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and completed inspection of calyces and stone retrieval using a flexible ureteroscope in an endourological model. Each participant's experience (no experience, 1-30 or >30 procedures) in laparoscopy, rigid ureteroscopy (RURS) and FURS was self-reported.

RESULTS

Median time taken to complete the laparoscopic task decreased with increasing laparoscopic experience (209 s 177 s 145 s, =0.008) whereas median time taken to complete the FURS tasks reduced with increasing FURS experience (405 s 250 s 163 s, =0.003) but not with RURS experience (400.5 s 397 s 331 s, =0.143), demonstrating construct validity. Positive educational impact of both tasks was high, with mean ratings of 4.16/5 and 4.10/5 respectively, demonstrating face validity.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates construct and face validities of laparoscopy and FURS simulation tasks among residents at a conference setting. Validation studies at a conference setting can be an effective avenue for evaluating simulation models and curriculum in the future.

摘要

目的

使用训练模型进行基于模拟的培训正越来越多地被用作帮助学员跨越学习曲线的一种工具。然而,手术模拟器的验证研究往往因数量较少而受到限制。我们旨在评估在大型会议环境中针对住院医师快速验证腹腔镜手术和软性输尿管镜检查(FURS)模拟训练任务的可行性。

方法

在2016年第14届亚洲泌尿外科协会大会期间,对来自亚洲各国的76名泌尿外科住院医师的腹腔镜手术和FURS技能进行了评估。住院医师在腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)中执行了移钉任务,并在腔内泌尿外科模型中使用软性输尿管镜完成了肾盏检查和结石取出。每位参与者在腹腔镜手术、硬性输尿管镜检查(RURS)和FURS方面的经验(无经验、1 - 30次或>30次手术)均为自我报告。

结果

完成腹腔镜任务的中位时间随着腹腔镜经验的增加而减少(209秒 177秒 145秒,P = 0.008),而完成FURS任务的中位时间随着FURS经验的增加而减少(405秒 250秒 163秒,P = 0.003),但与RURS经验无关(400.5秒 397秒 331秒,P = 0.143),证明了结构效度。两项任务的积极教育影响都很高,平均评分分别为4.16/5和4.10/5,证明了表面效度。

结论

我们的研究证明了在会议环境中住院医师腹腔镜手术和FURS模拟任务的结构效度和表面效度。在会议环境中进行验证研究可能是未来评估模拟模型和课程的有效途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/858c/8099649/8234c292301a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/858c/8099649/2b1ba44cdf6e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/858c/8099649/8234c292301a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/858c/8099649/2b1ba44cdf6e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/858c/8099649/8234c292301a/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of laparoscopy and flexible ureteroscopy tasks in inanimate simulation training models at a large-scale conference setting.在大型会议环境下的无生命模拟训练模型中对腹腔镜检查和软性输尿管镜检查任务的验证。
Asian J Urol. 2021 Apr;8(2):215-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
2
Simulation-based flexible ureteroscopy training using a novel ureteroscopy part-task trainer.使用新型输尿管镜部分任务训练器进行基于模拟的柔性输尿管镜检查训练。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):331-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2811.
3
Evaluation of Optimal Timing of Expert Feedback in a Simulated Flexible Ureteroscopy Course.模拟软性输尿管镜课程中专家反馈最佳时机的评估。
J Endourol. 2019 Jun;33(6):463-467. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0732. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
Objective Assessment and Standard Setting for Basic Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Skills Among Urology Trainees Using Simulation-Based Methods.使用基于模拟的方法对泌尿科受训者的基本软性输尿管镜检查技能进行客观评估和标准制定。
J Endourol. 2020 Apr;34(4):495-501. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0626. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
5
The impact of intense laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urology residents.强化腹腔镜技能培训对泌尿外科住院医师手术操作表现的影响。
J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1658-61.
6
The Impact of Endourological Experience on Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcomes and Performance at Different Levels of Expertise: Retrospective Multifactorial Analysis.经腔内泌尿外科经验对不同专业水平下软性输尿管镜手术结果和表现的影响:回顾性多因素分析。
Urol Int. 2020;104(5-6):452-458. doi: 10.1159/000504989. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
7
Multi-Institutional Validation of Fundamental Inanimate Robotic Skills Tasks.基础无生命机器人技能任务的多机构验证
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.125. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
8
Simulation-based training for prostate surgery.基于模拟的前列腺手术培训。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):665-74. doi: 10.1111/bju.12721. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery skills curriculum.美国泌尿外科学会基础腹腔镜泌尿外科手术技能课程的介绍和验证。
J Endourol. 2012 Feb;26(2):190-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0414. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
10
Basic Laparoscopic Skills Assessment Study: Validation and Standard Setting among Canadian Urology Trainees.基础腹腔镜技能评估研究:加拿大泌尿外科住院医师的验证与标准设定
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1539-1544. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1): a novel EAU training and assessment tool for basic endoscopic stone treatment skills-a collaborative work by ESU, ESUT and EULIS.验证内镜下碎石治疗步骤 1(EST-s1):一种新的 EAU 培训和评估工具,用于基本的内镜下碎石治疗技能-由 ESU、ESUT 和 EULIS 合作完成。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02736-4. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Learning Curves in Urolithiasis Surgery: A Systematic Review.结石病手术学习曲线:系统评价。
J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1008-1020. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0425.
3
Evolution and Uptake of the Endoscopic Stone Treatment Step 1 (EST-s1) Protocol: Establishment, Validation, and Assessment in a Collaboration by the European School of Urology and the Uro-Technology and Urolithiasis Sections.
内镜下结石治疗第一步(EST-s1)方案的演变与应用:欧洲泌尿外科学会与泌尿技术和尿石症分会合作进行的建立、验证及评估
Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):401-402. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Consensus Statement on Simulation, Training, and Assessment in Urolithiasis.欧洲泌尿外科学会结石学组(EULIS)关于结石病模拟、培训和评估的共识声明。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):614-620. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Initial Content Validation Results of a New Simulation Model for Flexible Ureteroscopy: The Key-Box.新型输尿管软镜模拟模型“钥匙盒”的初始内容验证结果
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):72-77. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0677. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
6
Comprehensive flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) simulator for training in endourology: The K-box model.用于腔内泌尿外科培训的综合柔性输尿管镜检查(FURS)模拟器:K盒模型
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(1):118-20. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.710. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Simulation-based flexible ureteroscopy training using a novel ureteroscopy part-task trainer.使用新型输尿管镜部分任务训练器进行基于模拟的柔性输尿管镜检查训练。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):331-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2811.
8
Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks.验证 AUA BLUS 任务。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.087. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Simulation-based ureteroscopy training: a systematic review.基于模拟的输尿管镜检查培训:一项系统评价
J Surg Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;72(1):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status.单次逆行经皮肾镜取石术经验的累积和分析及无石状态的预测因素分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e84878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084878. eCollection 2014.