From the Department of Internal Medicine, Sections of Cardiovascular Medicine (D.W.K., M.B.N., B.U.) and Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (D.W.K., M.A.E.), and the Departments of Neurology (P.D.) and Biostatistics and Data Science (H.C., M.A.E.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Doctor of Physical Therapy Division (A.M.P.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (R.J.M.), and the Department of Population Health Sciences (S.D.R.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, and Novant Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte (G.R.R.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University (D.J.W.), and the Department of Physical Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences at Thomas Jefferson University (L.A.H.) - both in Philadelphia; and Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Fairfax, VA (C.M.O.).
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 15;385(3):203-216. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026141. Epub 2021 May 16.
BACKGROUND: Older patients who are hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure have high rates of physical frailty, poor quality of life, delayed recovery, and frequent rehospitalizations. Interventions to address physical frailty in this population are not well established. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate a transitional, tailored, progressive rehabilitation intervention that included four physical-function domains (strength, balance, mobility, and endurance). The intervention was initiated during, or early after, hospitalization for heart failure and was continued after discharge for 36 outpatient sessions. The primary outcome was the score on the Short Physical Performance Battery (total scores range from 0 to 12, with lower scores indicating more severe physical dysfunction) at 3 months. The secondary outcome was the 6-month rate of rehospitalization for any cause. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients underwent randomization; 175 were assigned to the rehabilitation intervention and 174 to usual care (control). At baseline, patients in each group had markedly impaired physical function, and 97% were frail or prefrail; the mean number of coexisting conditions was five in each group. Patient retention in the intervention group was 82%, and adherence to the intervention sessions was 67%. After adjustment for baseline Short Physical Performance Battery score and other baseline characteristics, the least-squares mean (±SE) score on the Short Physical Performance Battery at 3 months was 8.3±0.2 in the intervention group and 6.9±0.2 in the control group (mean between-group difference, 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 2.0; P<0.001). At 6 months, the rates of rehospitalization for any cause were 1.18 in the intervention group and 1.28 in the control group (rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.19). There were 21 deaths (15 from cardiovascular causes) in the intervention group and 16 deaths (8 from cardiovascular causes) in the control group. The rates of death from any cause were 0.13 and 0.10, respectively (rate ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse population of older patients who were hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure, an early, transitional, tailored, progressive rehabilitation intervention that included multiple physical-function domains resulted in greater improvement in physical function than usual care. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; REHAB-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02196038.).
背景:因急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院的老年患者身体虚弱、生活质量差、恢复缓慢且经常再住院。针对该人群身体虚弱的干预措施尚未得到很好的建立。
方法:我们进行了一项多中心、随机、对照试验,以评估一种过渡性、量身定制、渐进性的康复干预措施,该措施包括四个身体功能领域(力量、平衡、移动和耐力)。该干预措施在心力衰竭住院期间或之后早期开始,并在 36 次门诊治疗后继续进行。主要结局是 3 个月时短体适能电池(总分范围为 0 至 12,得分越低表示身体功能障碍越严重)的得分。次要结局是 6 个月内因任何原因再住院的比率。
结果:共有 349 名患者接受了随机分组;175 名被分配到康复干预组,174 名被分配到常规护理(对照组)。在基线时,每组患者的身体功能均明显受损,97%的患者身体虚弱或衰弱前期;每组患者的共存疾病平均数量为 5 种。干预组的患者保留率为 82%,对干预方案的依从性为 67%。在调整基线短体适能电池评分和其他基线特征后,干预组 3 个月时短体适能电池的最小二乘均数(±SE)得分为 8.3±0.2,对照组为 6.9±0.2(组间平均差异,1.5;95%置信区间[CI],0.9 至 2.0;P<0.001)。6 个月时,因任何原因再住院的比率分别为干预组 1.18 例和对照组 1.28 例(比率,0.93;95%CI,0.66 至 1.19)。干预组有 21 例(15 例心血管原因)死亡,对照组有 16 例(8 例心血管原因)死亡。因任何原因死亡的比率分别为 0.13 和 0.10,(比率,1.17;95%CI,0.61 至 2.27)。
结论:在因急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院的老年患者中,早期、过渡性、量身定制、渐进性的康复干预措施,包括多个身体功能领域,可改善身体功能,优于常规护理。(由美国国立卫生研究院和其他机构资助;REHAB-HF ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT02196038)。
N Engl J Med. 2021-7-15
Circ Heart Fail. 2020-10
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025-7-1
Cell. 2020-5-28
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-11-22
Biomed Res Int. 2019-6-20