• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入补贴、医疗补助双重资格和残疾状况与医疗保险处方药受益人中高危药物使用的关联。

Association of low-income subsidy, medicaid dual eligibility, and disability status with high-risk medication use among Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Health Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Apr;18(4):2634-2642. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.005
PMID:34006485
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-income subsidy/dual eligibility (LIS/DE) status and disability status may be associated with high-risk medication (HRM) use but are not usually accounted for in medication-use quality measures.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of: 1) LIS/DE status and HRM use; and 2) disability status and HRM use, while controlling for both health plan level effects and patient characteristics for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plans (MA-PD) and stand-alone Prescription Drug Plans (PDP).

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study used 2013 Medicare data to determine if LIS/DE status and disability status were independently associated with HRM use (using the Pharmacy Quality Alliance HRM measure) in MA-PDs and PDPs. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models assessed the association of LIS/DE and HRM use, and disability and HRM use, after adjusting for health plan effect and patient-level confounders for MA-PD and PDP beneficiaries.

RESULTS

Of 520,019 MA-PD beneficiaries, 88,693 (17.1%) were LIS/DE and 48,997 (9.4%) were disabled. Of 881,264 PDP beneficiaries, 213,096 (24.2%) were LIS/DE, and 83,593 (9.5%) were disabled. LIS/DE beneficiaries had a higher percent of HRM users compared to non-LIS/DE MA-PD (13.3% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001) and PDP (17.1% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.001) beneficiaries. Disabled beneficiaries had a higher percent of HRM users compared to non-disabled MA-PD (17.0% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001) and PDP (22.9% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.001) beneficiaries. Multivariable analyses showed LIS/DE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.10) and disability (AOR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.34, 1.42) were associated with HRM use among MA-PD and PDP beneficiaries (LIS/DE AOR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.16; disability AOR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.34, 1.40).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of LIS/DE and disability with higher HRM use in both MA-PD and PDP beneficiaries, when controlling for health plan effects and patient characteristics, suggests these factors should be considered when comparing health plan performance on HRM measures.

摘要

背景

低收入补贴/双重资格(LIS/DE)身份和残疾状况可能与高风险药物(HRM)的使用有关,但通常不在药物使用质量措施中考虑。

目的

检验以下两者之间的关联:1)LIS/DE 身份和 HRM 使用;2)残疾状况和 HRM 使用,同时控制医疗保险优势处方药计划(MA-PD)和独立处方药计划(PDP)中健康计划水平的影响和患者特征。

方法

本回顾性横断面研究使用 2013 年医疗保险数据,确定 LIS/DE 身份和残疾状况是否与 MA-PD 和 PDP 中的 HRM 使用(使用药房质量联盟 HRM 衡量标准)独立相关。多变量广义线性混合模型评估了 LIS/DE 和 HRM 使用以及残疾和 HRM 使用之间的关联,同时调整了 MA-PD 和 PDP 受益人的健康计划效果和患者水平混杂因素。

结果

在 520019 名 MA-PD 受益人中,88693 人(17.1%)是 LIS/DE,48997 人(9.4%)是残疾。在 881264 名 PDP 受益人中,213096 人(24.2%)是 LIS/DE,83593 人(9.5%)是残疾。与非 LIS/DE MA-PD(13.3%对 9.7%,p<0.001)和 PDP(17.1%对 13.2%,p<0.001)相比,LIS/DE 受益人的 HRM 用户比例更高。与非残疾 MA-PD(17.0%对 9.6%,p<0.001)和 PDP(22.9%对 13.2%,p<0.001)相比,残疾受益人的 HRM 用户比例更高。多变量分析显示,LIS/DE(调整后的优势比[OR] = 1.07;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.04,1.10)和残疾(OR = 1.38;95%CI = 1.34,1.42)与 MA-PD 和 PDP 受益人的 HRM 使用相关(LIS/DE OR = 1.14;95%CI = 1.12,1.16;残疾 OR = 1.37;95%CI = 1.34,1.40)。

结论

在控制健康计划效果和患者特征的情况下,LIS/DE 和残疾与 MA-PD 和 PDP 中更高的 HRM 使用之间的关联表明,在比较 HRM 措施的健康计划绩效时,应考虑这些因素。

相似文献

1
Association of low-income subsidy, medicaid dual eligibility, and disability status with high-risk medication use among Medicare Part D beneficiaries.低收入补贴、医疗补助双重资格和残疾状况与医疗保险处方药受益人中高危药物使用的关联。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Apr;18(4):2634-2642. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Geographic Variation in the Prevalence of High-Risk Medication Use Among Medicare Part D Beneficiaries by Hospital Referral Region.医疗保险D部分受益人中高风险药物使用患病率按医院转诊区域划分的地理差异
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1309-1316. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1309.
3
Adjusting Medicare Advantage star ratings for socioeconomic status and disability.调整医疗保险优势计划星级评定以反映社会经济地位和残疾状况。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Sep 1;24(9):e285-e291.
4
Comparison of statin adherence among beneficiaries in MA-PD plans versus PDPs.医保优待计划(MA-PD)与处方药计划(PDP)受益人的他汀类药物依从性比较。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Mar;18(2):106-15. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.2.106.
5
Associations Between Annual Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy Loss and Prescription Drug Spending and Use.年度联邦医疗保险处方药补贴损失与处方药支出和使用之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235152. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5152.
6
PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25.PDP 还是 MA-PD?CMS 第 25 区的医疗保险部分 D 注册决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.002.
7
Do Restrictions on Antipsychotic Use Differ Between Medicare Part D Stand-Alone Versus Medicare Advantage Plans?医疗保险D部分独立计划与医疗保险优势计划在抗精神病药物使用限制方面是否存在差异?
Consult Pharm. 2017 Feb 1;32(2):109-118. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2017.109.
8
Evaluation of an integrated adherence program aimed to increase Medicare Part D star rating measures.评估旨在提高医疗保险部分 D 星级评定措施的综合依从性计划。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Dec;20(12):1193-203. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.12.1193.
9
Patterns of prescription drug expenditures and medication adherence among medicare part D beneficiaries with and without the low-income supplement.有和没有低收入补贴的医疗保险D部分受益人的处方药支出模式和药物依从性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 20;14:665. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0665-3.
10
Comparison of oral anticoagulation use and adherence among Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in stand-alone prescription drug plans vs Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans.比较参加独立处方药计划和医疗保险优势处方药计划的 Medicare 受益人的口服抗凝药物使用情况和依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Feb;28(2):266-274. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.2.266.