Senior Teaching and Research Assistant, Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Resident, Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J World Fed Orthod. 2021 Sep;10(3):105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 May 15.
Even though treatment of Class II malocclusion with premolar extractions and incisor retraction might affect incisor inclination and soft tissue profile, the effects of bracket prescription on this have not been thoroughly assessed.
Fifty patients (mean age: 13.6 years; 34% male) receiving extraction-based treatment with either standard Edgewise or pre-adjusted appliances were included. Between-group differences in the incisor inclination assessed with lateral cephalograms were analyzed statistically with linear/logistic regression at 5%.
Treatment-induced changes included retroclination of the upper/lower incisors (-3.0° and -2.0°, respectively), retraction of the upper/lower incisors (-3.4 mm and -1.5 mm, respectively), retraction of the upper/lower lip (-2.1 mm and -2.0 mm, respectively), and enlargement of the nasolabial angle (+1.6°). Analysis of the data adjusting for confounders indicated that the pre-adjusted group, after treatment, had larger inclination of the upper or lower incisors (+3.2° and +4.5°, respectively), more prominent upper incisors relative to the facial plane (+1.3 mm), and smaller interincisal angle (-7.3 or -7.7°). Post-treatment upper incisor inclination fell within the cephalometric norm significantly more in the pre-adjusted than in the standard Edgewise group (odds ratio 4.3; 95% confidence interval 1.1-16.6). No differences were found in lower incisor prominence, upper/lower lip prominence, or nasolabial angle.
Pre-adjusted appliances were associated with increased inclination of the upper and lower incisors, with more prominent upper incisors, and with more acute interincisal angle after retraction compared with standard Edgewise appliances. However, such differences did not translate in greater retraction of the upper/lower lips and greater nasolabial angle.
尽管使用磨牙拔牙和切牙内收治疗 II 类错[牙合]可能会影响切牙倾斜和软组织侧貌,但支架处方对此的影响尚未得到彻底评估。
纳入 50 名(平均年龄:13.6 岁;34%为男性)接受拔牙治疗的患者,分别使用标准方丝弓或预成方丝弓。使用线性/逻辑回归在 5%的水平上对侧位头颅侧位片评估的切牙倾斜的组间差异进行统计学分析。
治疗引起的变化包括上颌/下颌切牙的后倾(分别为-3.0°和-2.0°)、上颌/下颌切牙的内收(分别为-3.4mm 和-1.5mm)、上颌/下颌唇的内收(分别为-2.1mm 和-2.0mm)以及鼻唇角的增大(+1.6°)。调整混杂因素后分析数据表明,预成组治疗后上颌或下颌切牙的倾斜度更大(分别为+3.2°和+4.5°)、上颌切牙相对于面平面更为突出(+1.3mm)、切牙间角更小(-7.3 或-7.7°)。与标准方丝弓组相比,预成组治疗后上切牙的倾斜度更符合头影测量标准(优势比 4.3;95%置信区间 1.1-16.6)。在下切牙的突出度、上颌/下颌唇的突出度或鼻唇角方面,两组之间没有差异。
与标准方丝弓相比,预成矫治器可使上颌和下颌切牙的倾斜度增加,上颌切牙更突出,内收后切牙间角更尖锐。然而,这些差异并未导致上颌/下颌唇的更大内收和更大的鼻唇角。