Abbas Ahmed M, Pickart Andrea J, Goldsmith Laurel M, Davenport Desiree N, Newby Britney, Muñoz-Rodríguez Adolfo F, Grewell Brenda J, Castillo Jesús M
Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University 61413, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, 83523, Qena, Egypt.
AoB Plants. 2021 Apr 8;13(3):plab014. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab014. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Invasive alien plant species impart considerable impacts that contribute to the decline of biodiversity worldwide. The ability of an invasive species to overcome barriers to establish and spread in new environments, and the long-term effects of plant invasions supporting their persistence are keys to invasion success. The capacity of introduced species to form soil seed banks can contribute to their invasiveness, yet few studies of invaders have addressed seed bank dynamics. Improved knowledge of this recruitment process can improve conservation management. We studied temporal and spatial changes in soil seed bank characteristics of the cordgrass from two continental invaded ranges. In the Odiel Marshes (Southwest Iberian Peninsula), formed transient seed banks (<1 year). At Humboldt Bay Estuary (California), viable seeds persisted for at least 4 years though the germination percentage fell abruptly after the first year from 29 % to less than 5 % of remaining viable seeds. Total soil seed bank density increased with above-ground cover in both estuaries, pointing to the transient component of the seed bank as a critical component of vegetation dynamics during invasion. Even so, seed densities as high as c. 750 seeds m in Odiel Marshes and c. 12 400 seeds m in Humboldt Bay were recorded in some plots without fruiting plants. spikelet (dispersal unit) density was more than double close to the sediment surface than deeper within soil. Our study shows the importance of evaluating seed banks during the design of invasive species management since seed bank persistence may vary among invaded sites, and can affect the timing and duration required for desired management outcomes.
外来入侵植物物种造成了相当大的影响,导致全球生物多样性下降。入侵物种克服障碍在新环境中建立和扩散的能力,以及植物入侵支持其持续存在的长期影响是入侵成功的关键。外来物种形成土壤种子库的能力有助于其入侵性,但很少有关于入侵者的研究涉及种子库动态。对这一补充过程的深入了解可以改善保护管理。我们研究了来自两个大陆入侵区域的互花米草土壤种子库特征的时空变化。在奥迪尔沼泽(伊比利亚半岛西南部),形成了短暂的种子库(<1年)。在洪堡湾河口(加利福尼亚州),有活力的种子至少持续了4年,尽管第一年之后发芽率从29%急剧下降到剩余有活力种子的不到5%。在两个河口,土壤种子库总密度都随着地上覆盖度的增加而增加,这表明种子库的短暂成分是入侵期间植被动态的关键组成部分。即便如此,在一些没有结果植物的地块中,奥迪尔沼泽记录到的种子密度高达约750粒/平方米,洪堡湾记录到的种子密度高达约12400粒/平方米。小穗(传播单位)密度在沉积物表面附近比土壤深处高出一倍多。我们的研究表明,在设计入侵物种管理方案时评估种子库非常重要,因为种子库的持久性可能因入侵地点而异,并会影响实现预期管理结果所需的时间和持续时间。