Orish Verner N, Simpiney Saviour Anorkplim, Lokpo Sylvester Yao, Agordoh Percival D, Lopez Duniesky Martinez, Alalbila Thelma M, Sanyaolu Adekunle
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Department of Physician Assistant, School of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
J Parasitol Res. 2021 Apr 28;2021:6695313. doi: 10.1155/2021/6695313. eCollection 2021.
This study evaluated physicians' perception and diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections (IPI) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This cross-sectional survey used a Google form questionnaire distributed online. Demographic and clinical practice information was solicited, including if "IPI was considered as a diagnosis in the last patient seen," "if stool investigation was requested among the last patients seen," and physicians' perception of the burden of IPI in the country. Using Pearson chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis, we tested the significance of the associations of the job cadre of the physicians and their perception of the IPI burden with consideration of IPI as a diagnosis in the last patient seen, request for stool investigation in the last patient seen, and overall frequency of the request for stool investigation. Ultimately, 184 physicians responded. The majority agreed to "often seeing patients with GI symptoms" (156, 84.7%), "not considering IPI among the last patient seen" (106, 57.6%), and "not requesting stool investigation among the last patient seen with symptoms" (136, 73.9%). House officers (81, 44.2%) constituted the highest proportion of physicians who considered IPI as a diagnosis among the last patient seen (39, 48.1%, = 0.05). Most physicians (138, 75%) considered IPI as a burden in Ghana. They constituted significant proportions of the physicians who considered IPI as a diagnosis among their last patients seen (65, 83.3%, = 0.02) and were twice more likely to consider IPI as a diagnosis among the last patients seen than their colleagues who did not consider IPI as a burden in Ghana (AOR 2.26, = 0.04). The consideration of IPI as a diagnosis among patients with GI symptoms and request for stool investigations was low among physicians in this study. Further engagements with physicians in Ghana are needed to help improve their diagnosis of IPI in patients with GI symptoms.
本研究评估了医生对胃肠道(GI)症状患者肠道寄生虫感染(IPI)的认知与诊断情况。这项横断面调查使用了在线发放的谷歌表单问卷。收集了人口统计学和临床实践信息,包括“在最后一位诊治的患者中是否考虑过IPI诊断”“在最后诊治的患者中是否要求进行粪便检查”以及医生对该国IPI负担的认知。通过Pearson卡方检验和多因素逻辑回归分析,我们检验了医生的工作岗位类别及其对IPI负担的认知与在最后一位诊治的患者中考虑IPI诊断、在最后诊治的患者中要求进行粪便检查以及粪便检查要求的总体频率之间关联的显著性。最终,184名医生做出了回应。大多数医生同意“经常诊治有胃肠道症状的患者”(156人,84.7%)、“在最后一位诊治的患者中未考虑IPI”(106人,57.6%)以及“在最后一位有症状的患者中未要求进行粪便检查”(136人,73.9%)。住院医师(81人,44.2%)在最后一位诊治的患者中考虑IPI诊断的医生比例最高(39人,48.1%,P = 0.05)。大多数医生(138人,75%)认为IPI是加纳的一个负担。他们在最后诊治的患者中考虑IPI诊断的医生中占显著比例(65人,83.3%,P = 0.02),并且在最后诊治的患者中考虑IPI诊断的可能性是那些不认为IPI是加纳负担的同事的两倍(比值比2.26,P = 0.04)。在本研究中,医生对有胃肠道症状患者考虑IPI诊断以及要求进行粪便检查的比例较低。需要与加纳的医生进一步合作,以帮助他们改善对有胃肠道症状患者的IPI诊断。