• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施火棉胶袋方案以改善妇科刮宫少量标本的全切片成像

Implementation of Collodion Bag Protocol to Improve Whole-slide Imaging of Scant Gynecologic Curettage Specimens.

作者信息

Jhun Iny, Levy David, Lim Harumi, Herrera Quintina, Dobo Erika, Burns Dominique, Hetherington William, Macasaet Ronald, Young April J, Kong Christina S, Folkins Ann K, Yang Eric Joon

机构信息

Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Pathol Inform. 2021 Jan 8;12:2. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_82_20. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.4103/jpi.jpi_82_20
PMID:34012706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8112341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital pathology has been increasingly implemented for primary surgical pathology diagnosis. In our institution, digital pathology was recently deployed in the gynecologic (GYN) pathology practice. A notable challenge encountered in the digital evaluation of GYN specimens was high rates of scanning failure of specimens with fragmented as well as scant tissue. To improve tissue detection failure rates, we implemented a novel use of the collodion bag cell block preparation method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we reviewed 108 endocervical curettage (ECC) specimens, representing specimens processed with and without the collodion bag cell block method ( = 56 without collodion bag, = 52 with collodion bag).

RESULTS

Tissue detection failure rates were reduced from 77% (43/56) in noncollodion bag cases to 23/52 (44%) of collodion bag cases, representing a 42% reduction. The median total area of tissue detection failure per level was 0.35 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.14, 0.70 mm) for noncollodion bag cases and 0.08 mm (IQR: 0.03, 0.20 mm) for collodion bag cases. This represents a greater than fourfold reduction in the total area of tissue detection failure per level ( < 0.001). In addition, there were no out-of-focus levels among collodion bag cases, compared to 6/56 (11%) of noncollodion bag cases (median total area = 4.9 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The collodion bag method significantly improved the digital image quality of fragmented/scant GYN curettage specimens, increased efficiency and accuracy of diagnostic evaluation, and enhanced identification of tissue contamination during processing. The logistical challenges and labor cost of deploying the collodion bag protocol are important considerations for feasibility assessment at an institutional level.

摘要

背景

数字病理学已越来越多地应用于原发性外科病理学诊断。在我们机构,数字病理学最近已部署到妇科(GYN)病理学实践中。在对妇科标本进行数字评估时遇到的一个显著挑战是,组织碎片多以及组织稀少的标本扫描失败率很高。为了提高组织检测失败率,我们采用了火棉胶袋细胞块制备方法的新用途。

材料与方法

在本研究中,我们回顾了108例宫颈管刮术(ECC)标本,分别代表采用和未采用火棉胶袋细胞块方法处理的标本(未采用火棉胶袋的标本n = 56,采用火棉胶袋的标本n = 52)。

结果

组织检测失败率从未采用火棉胶袋的病例中的77%(43/56)降至采用火棉胶袋病例中的23/52(44%),降低了42%。未采用火棉胶袋病例每级组织检测失败的总面积中位数为0.35平方毫米(四分位间距[IQR]:0.14,0.70平方毫米),采用火棉胶袋病例为0.08平方毫米(IQR:0.03,0.20平方毫米)。这表明每级组织检测失败的总面积减少了四倍多(P < 0.001)。此外,采用火棉胶袋的病例中没有失焦层面,而未采用火棉胶袋的病例中有6/56(11%)存在失焦层面(总面积中位数 = 4.9平方毫米)。

结论

火棉胶袋方法显著提高了组织碎片多/稀少的妇科刮除术标本的数字图像质量,提高了诊断评估的效率和准确性,并增强了处理过程中组织污染的识别。采用火棉胶袋方案的后勤挑战和劳动力成本是机构层面可行性评估的重要考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Implementation of Collodion Bag Protocol to Improve Whole-slide Imaging of Scant Gynecologic Curettage Specimens.实施火棉胶袋方案以改善妇科刮宫少量标本的全切片成像
J Pathol Inform. 2021 Jan 8;12:2. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_82_20. eCollection 2021.
2
It is all in the bag: collodion bag versus HistoGel cell block method.都在囊中:明胶袋与HistoGel 细胞块法。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Jan-Feb;9(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
3
Digital pathology for intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of thoracic specimens: an evaluation of a system using remote sampling and whole slide imaging diagnosis.数字病理学用于胸标本术中冷冻切片诊断:使用远程采样和全玻片成像诊断系统的评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2020 Aug;73(8):503-506. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206236. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
4
Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging.数字病理学与全切片成像的应用及挑战
Biotech Histochem. 2015 Jul;90(5):341-7. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2015.1044566. Epub 2015 May 15.
5
Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice.使用Omnyx数字病理系统进行细胞学实践的可行性。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
6
Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brushing.宫颈管搔刮术与宫颈管刷检术的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;96(1):90-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00836-x.
7
Pitfalls in the use of whole slide imaging for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: A pilot study in surgical neuropathology.全切片成像在中枢神经系统肿瘤诊断中的应用陷阱:外科神经病理学的一项初步研究
J Pathol Inform. 2016 May 4;7:25. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.181769. eCollection 2016.
8
Diagnostic Efficiency in Digital Pathology: A Comparison of Optical Versus Digital Assessment in 510 Surgical Pathology Cases.数字病理学中的诊断效率:510例外科病理学病例的光学评估与数字评估比较
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Jan;42(1):53-59. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000930.
9
Colposcopic endocervical brushing cytology appears to be more sensitive than histologic endocervical curettage for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma.阴道镜下宫颈管刷细胞学检查似乎比组织学宫颈管搔刮术更能检测宫颈腺癌。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2021 Mar-Apr;10(2):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
ABSCESS-FORMING FACTOR(S) PRODUCED BY STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. I. COLLODION BAG IMPLANTATION TECHNIQUE.金黄色葡萄球菌产生的脓肿形成因子。I. 火棉胶袋植入技术。
J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86(4):611-5. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.611-615.1963.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid Deployment of Whole Slide Imaging for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology at Stanford Medicine: Responding to Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic.斯坦福医学中心外科病理学中用于初步诊断的全玻片成像的快速部署:应对 COVID-19 大流行的挑战。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023 Mar 1;147(3):359-367. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0438-OA.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology.数字全玻片成像与光学显微镜在外科病理学原发性诊断中的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Oct 1;144(10):1245-1253. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0569-OA.
2
It is all in the bag: collodion bag versus HistoGel cell block method.都在囊中:明胶袋与HistoGel 细胞块法。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Jan-Feb;9(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
3
Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center.
全 slides 成像等效性和效率研究:大型学术中心的经验。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jul;32(7):916-928. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0205-0. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
The Importance of eSlide Macro Images for Primary Diagnosis with Whole Slide Imaging.eSlide宏图像在全切片成像初步诊断中的重要性。
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Dec 24;9:46. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_70_18. eCollection 2018.
5
Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).全玻片成像与显微镜检查在外科病理学原发性诊断中的比较:一项纳入1992例病例的多中心双盲随机非劣效性研究(关键研究)
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Jan;42(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000948.
6
A superior method for cell block preparation for fine-needle aspiration biopsies.一种用于细针穿刺活检细胞块制备的优质方法。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Jul;124(7):508-18. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21722. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.验证全切片成像在病理学诊断中的应用:美国病理学家学会病理学和实验室质量中心指南。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Dec;137(12):1710-22. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0093-CP. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
A celloidin bag for the histological preparation of cytologic material.一种用于细胞学材料组织学制备的火棉胶袋。
J Clin Pathol. 1982 May;35(5):574-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.5.574.