Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 May 18.
The long-term outcome of mechanical aortic and mitral prosthetic valve (A-PV, M-PV) dysfunction (PVD) remains a serious complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of combined transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and fluoroscopy (F) in patients with suspected PVD. A total of 354 patients (178 A-PV, 176 M-PV) were imaged by TTE and F within 5 days of hospital admission. PVD was confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, effective thrombolysis, or surgical inspection. PVD was confirmed in 101 patients (57%) with M-PV and 99 (55%) with A-PV. Regardless of the mechanism of PVD, TTE shows good sensitivity and specificity, with accuracy of 80% for M-PV and 91% for A-PV. F shows high specificity, but low sensitivity with accuracy of 68% for M-PV and 78% for A-PV. The integration of TTE + F significantly improved accuracy both for M-PV (83%) and A-PV (96%). At ROC analysis, the combined model of TTE + F showed the highest area under the curve for the detection of PVD compared with TTE and F alone (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients with a clinical suspicion of PVD, the combined model of TTE + F offers incremental value over TTE or F alone. This multimodality imaging approach overcomes limitations of TTE or F alone and provides prompt identification of patients who may require further imaging assessment and/or closer follow up.
人工机械主动脉瓣和二尖瓣瓣膜(A-PV、M-PV)功能障碍(PVD)的长期预后仍然是一种严重的并发症,与高发病率和死亡率相关。我们试图评估经胸超声心动图(TTE)和荧光透视(F)联合在疑似 PVD 患者中的诊断价值。共有 354 例患者(178 例 A-PV,176 例 M-PV)在住院后 5 天内接受了 TTE 和 F 检查。PVD 通过经食管超声心动图、计算机断层扫描、有效溶栓或手术检查得到证实。101 例(57%)M-PV 和 99 例(55%)A-PV 患者证实存在 PVD。无论 PVD 的机制如何,TTE 均显示出良好的敏感性和特异性,其对 M-PV 的准确性为 80%,对 A-PV 的准确性为 91%。F 显示出较高的特异性,但敏感性较低,其对 M-PV 的准确性为 68%,对 A-PV 的准确性为 78%。TTE+F 的整合显著提高了 M-PV(83%)和 A-PV(96%)的准确性。在 ROC 分析中,与 TTE 和 F 单独使用相比,TTE+F 的联合模型在检测 PVD 方面显示出最高的曲线下面积(p<0.001)。总之,对于临床怀疑存在 PVD 的患者,TTE+F 的联合模型优于 TTE 或 F 单独使用。这种多模态成像方法克服了 TTE 或 F 单独使用的局限性,并能迅速识别可能需要进一步影像学评估和/或更密切随访的患者。