Suppr超能文献

机械人工心脏瓣膜功能障碍的检测。

Detection of Mechanical Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 May 18.

Abstract

The long-term outcome of mechanical aortic and mitral prosthetic valve (A-PV, M-PV) dysfunction (PVD) remains a serious complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of combined transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and fluoroscopy (F) in patients with suspected PVD. A total of 354 patients (178 A-PV, 176 M-PV) were imaged by TTE and F within 5 days of hospital admission. PVD was confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, effective thrombolysis, or surgical inspection. PVD was confirmed in 101 patients (57%) with M-PV and 99 (55%) with A-PV. Regardless of the mechanism of PVD, TTE shows good sensitivity and specificity, with accuracy of 80% for M-PV and 91% for A-PV. F shows high specificity, but low sensitivity with accuracy of 68% for M-PV and 78% for A-PV. The integration of TTE + F significantly improved accuracy both for M-PV (83%) and A-PV (96%). At ROC analysis, the combined model of TTE + F showed the highest area under the curve for the detection of PVD compared with TTE and F alone (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients with a clinical suspicion of PVD, the combined model of TTE + F offers incremental value over TTE or F alone. This multimodality imaging approach overcomes limitations of TTE or F alone and provides prompt identification of patients who may require further imaging assessment and/or closer follow up.

摘要

人工机械主动脉瓣和二尖瓣瓣膜(A-PV、M-PV)功能障碍(PVD)的长期预后仍然是一种严重的并发症,与高发病率和死亡率相关。我们试图评估经胸超声心动图(TTE)和荧光透视(F)联合在疑似 PVD 患者中的诊断价值。共有 354 例患者(178 例 A-PV,176 例 M-PV)在住院后 5 天内接受了 TTE 和 F 检查。PVD 通过经食管超声心动图、计算机断层扫描、有效溶栓或手术检查得到证实。101 例(57%)M-PV 和 99 例(55%)A-PV 患者证实存在 PVD。无论 PVD 的机制如何,TTE 均显示出良好的敏感性和特异性,其对 M-PV 的准确性为 80%,对 A-PV 的准确性为 91%。F 显示出较高的特异性,但敏感性较低,其对 M-PV 的准确性为 68%,对 A-PV 的准确性为 78%。TTE+F 的整合显著提高了 M-PV(83%)和 A-PV(96%)的准确性。在 ROC 分析中,与 TTE 和 F 单独使用相比,TTE+F 的联合模型在检测 PVD 方面显示出最高的曲线下面积(p<0.001)。总之,对于临床怀疑存在 PVD 的患者,TTE+F 的联合模型优于 TTE 或 F 单独使用。这种多模态成像方法克服了 TTE 或 F 单独使用的局限性,并能迅速识别可能需要进一步影像学评估和/或更密切随访的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验