Suppr超能文献

通过动态24小时血压监测评估每日一次乌拉地尔治疗轻度或中度原发性高血压的疗效。

Efficacy of once-daily urapidil treatment in mild or moderate essential hypertension assessed by ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring.

作者信息

Trimarco B, Rosiello G, Feldhaus P, Steinijans V W, Vecchione F, Cuocolo A, Lembo G, Volpe M

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Naples.

出版信息

Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 6:173-81. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800356-00023.

Abstract

The blood pressure-lowering effect and tolerability of urapidil 120 mg once daily versus urapidil 60 mg twice daily was compared in 36 outpatients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate essential hypertension. Patients were enrolled in the study if they showed a favourable response to urapidil 60 mg twice daily at the end of a 2-week run-in as revealed by a first non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure profile. The patients were then randomly allocated to a 6-week double-blind treatment with either urapidil 120 mg once daily or urapidil 60 mg twice daily. Blood pressure, heart rate and adverse reactions were recorded every 2 weeks in the morning before drug intake. A second 24-hour blood pressure profile was taken at the end of this treatment phase. Compared with the pretreatment value after placebo run-in, urapidil 60 mg twice daily lowered supine morning blood pressure from 159/103 to 138/89. Urapidil 120 mg once daily lowered blood pressure from 161/102 to 139/90. The decrease in blood pressure was statistically significant within (p less than 0.001) but not between the treatment groups. Similar results were obtained with standing blood pressures. Side effects were observed in 2 patients with urapidil 60 mg twice daily (dizziness, intermittent lack of ejaculation) and in 7 patients with urapidil 120 mg once daily (5 with dizziness, and 1 each with headache and palpitations). Thus, urapidil 120 mg once daily lowers elevated blood pressure throughout a 24-hour period as effectively as 60 mg twice daily. Therefore, during long term therapy, the tolerability but not the efficacy of urapidil appears to be directly related to its peak serum concentrations.

摘要

在36例新诊断的轻度至中度原发性高血压门诊患者中,比较了每天一次服用120毫克乌拉地尔与每天两次服用60毫克乌拉地尔的降压效果和耐受性。如果患者在为期2周的导入期结束时,通过首次无创24小时血压监测显示对每天两次服用60毫克乌拉地尔有良好反应,就纳入本研究。然后将患者随机分配接受为期6周的双盲治疗,分别为每天一次服用120毫克乌拉地尔或每天两次服用60毫克乌拉地尔。在每天早晨服药前每2周记录血压、心率和不良反应。在该治疗阶段结束时进行第二次24小时血压监测。与安慰剂导入期后的预处理值相比,每天两次服用60毫克乌拉地尔使仰卧位早晨血压从159/103降至138/89。每天一次服用120毫克乌拉地尔使血压从161/102降至139/90。治疗组内血压下降具有统计学意义(p小于0.001),但两组之间无统计学差异。站立位血压也得到了类似结果。每天两次服用60毫克乌拉地尔的2例患者出现副作用(头晕、间歇性射精障碍),每天一次服用120毫克乌拉地尔的7例患者出现副作用(5例头晕,1例头痛,1例心悸)。因此,每天一次服用120毫克乌拉地尔在24小时内降低血压升高的效果与每天两次服用60毫克乌拉地尔一样有效。因此,在长期治疗期间,乌拉地尔的耐受性而非疗效似乎与其血清峰值浓度直接相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验