Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan;111(1):179-186. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2304. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
Real-world evidence (RWE) on the effectiveness of treatments in Crohn's disease (CD) derived from clinical practice data will help fill many evidence gaps left by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Emulating RCTs with healthcare database studies may calibrate RWE studies in CD. We aimed to emulate the SONIC trial on the effectiveness of infliximab in patients with CD using US and French healthcare claims data. SONIC had shown improved remission with combination therapy (i.e., infliximab plus thiopurines) compared with infliximab monotherapy. Using claims data (2004-2019) from commercially insured patients in the United States (IBM MarketScan and Optum) and France (Système National des Données de Santé (National Healthcare Data System) (SNDS)), we conducted a cohort study of patients with CD who initiated combination therapy and compared them with patients who initiated infliximab alone. The primary outcome was a composite end point of treatment failure including hospitalization or surgery related to CD, treatment switch, or continuation of corticosteroids 26 weeks after infliximab initiation. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts. We identified 1,437 PS-matched pairs of combination therapy vs. infliximab monotherapy users. As in SONIC, the risk of treatment failure was decreased with combination therapy in the overall cohort (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.82; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97 in SONIC). Findings were consistent across MarketScan, Optum, and SNDS databases: RR (95% CI), 0.83 (0.63-1.10), 0.66 (0.46-0.93), and 0.68 (0.57-0.82), as well as component end points. These robust findings highlight opportunities in RWE analysis for studying treatment effectiveness in patients with CD in clinical practice.
真实世界证据(RWE)来源于临床实践数据,可填补随机对照试验(RCT)留下的许多证据空白,有助于评估克罗恩病(CD)治疗的有效性。使用医疗保健数据库研究来模拟 RCT 可以校准 CD 中的 RWE 研究。我们旨在使用美国和法国的医疗保健索赔数据模拟 SONIC 试验,以评估英夫利昔单抗治疗 CD 的疗效。SONIC 试验表明,与英夫利昔单抗单药治疗相比,联合治疗(即英夫利昔单抗联合硫嘌呤)可改善缓解率。本研究利用美国(IBM MarketScan 和 Optum)和法国(国家医疗保健数据系统(SNDS))商业保险患者的索赔数据(2004-2019 年),对接受联合治疗的 CD 患者进行了队列研究,并与单独使用英夫利昔单抗的患者进行了比较。主要结局是英夫利昔单抗治疗 26 周后发生的包括与 CD 相关的住院或手术、治疗转换或继续使用皮质类固醇的复合治疗失败终点。采用倾向评分(PS)匹配队列估计风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。我们确定了 1437 对 PS 匹配的联合治疗与英夫利昔单抗单药治疗患者。与 SONIC 试验结果一致,在整体队列中,联合治疗可降低治疗失败的风险(RR,0.71;95%CI,0.62-0.82;RR,0.78;95%CI,0.62-0.97)。在 MarketScan、Optum 和 SNDS 数据库中的结果均一致:RR(95%CI)分别为 0.83(0.63-1.10)、0.66(0.46-0.93)和 0.68(0.57-0.82)以及各组成部分终点。这些稳健的结果突出了在真实世界证据分析中研究 CD 患者临床实践中治疗效果的机会。