Suppr超能文献

早期糖尿病周围神经病的感觉和运动轴突兴奋性检测。

Sensory and motor axonal excitability testing in early diabetic neuropathy.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul;132(7):1407-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.02.397. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the pathophysiology of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and examine the diagnostic value of sensory and motor axonal excitability testing.

METHODS

One hundred and eleven type 2 diabetics with and without DPN (disease duration: 6.36 ± 0.25 years) and 60 controls were included. All participants received a thorough clinical examination including Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score, nerve conduction studies (NCS), and sensory and motor excitability tests. Patients were compared by the likelihood of neuropathy presence, ranging from no DPN (17), possible/probable DPN (46) to NCS-confirmed DPN (48).

RESULTS

Motor excitability tests showed differences in rheobase and depolarizing threshold electrotonus measures between NCS-confirmed DPN group and controls but no changes in hyperpolarising threshold electrotonus or recovery cycle parameters. Sensory excitability showed even less changes despite pronounced sensory NCS abnormalities. There were only weak correlations between the above motor excitability parameters and clinical scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in excitability in the examined patient group were subtle, perhaps because of the relatively short disease duration.

SIGNIFICANCE

Less pronounced excitability changes than NCS suggest that axonal excitability testing is not of diagnostic value for early DPN and does not provide information on the mechanisms.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在深入了解糖尿病性多发性神经病(DPN)的病理生理学,并探讨感觉和运动轴突兴奋性检测的诊断价值。

方法

纳入 111 例 2 型糖尿病患者,其中包括有和无 DPN(病程:6.36±0.25 年)的患者以及 60 例对照者。所有参与者均接受了详细的临床检查,包括密歇根神经病变筛查工具(MNSI)评分、神经传导研究(NCS)以及感觉和运动兴奋性测试。通过存在神经病变的可能性对患者进行比较,范围从无 DPN(17 例)、可能/可能的 DPN(46 例)到 NCS 确诊的 DPN(48 例)。

结果

运动兴奋性测试显示,NCS 确诊的 DPN 组与对照组之间在阈强度和去极化电紧张阈测量方面存在差异,但在超极化电紧张阈或恢复周期参数方面没有变化。尽管感觉 NCS 异常明显,但感觉兴奋性变化更小。上述运动兴奋性参数与临床评分之间仅存在弱相关性。

结论

在研究的患者组中,兴奋性变化较为微妙,这可能是由于病程相对较短。

意义

与 NCS 相比,兴奋性变化不明显表明轴突兴奋性测试对早期 DPN 的诊断价值不大,也不能提供有关机制的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验