Am J Vet Res. 2021 Jun;82(6):510-515. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.82.6.510.
To determine the effect of epitendinous suture (ES) caliber on the tensile strength of flexor tendon repairs in cadaveric specimens from dogs.
60 cadaveric superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFTs) from 30 skeletally mature dogs.
Specimens were randomly assigned to 5 suture caliber groups (n = 12 SDFTs/group). After sharp transection, SDFTs were repaired by placement of a simple continuous circumferential ES created with size-0, 2-0, 3-0, 4-0, or 5-0 polypropylene suture. Constructs were preloaded to 2 N and load tested to failure. Loads at yield, peak, and failure and mode of failure were compared among groups by statistical methods.
Yield, peak, and failure loads for SDFT repair constructs were positively correlated with ES caliber and did not differ between the size-0 and 2-0 groups on pairwise comparisons. Yield load was significantly greater for size-0, 2-0, and 3-0 groups than for the 4-0 and 5-0 groups. Peak and failure loads were significantly greater for the size-0 and 2-0 groups than for the remaining groups. Most size-0 (12/12), 2-0 (12/12), and 3-0 (10/12) group constructs failed because of ES pull-through; several constructs in the 4-0 group (5/12) and most in the 5-0 group (11/12) failed because of ES breakage.
Results suggested size-0 and 2-0 sutures should be considered when placing an ES for flexor tendon repairs in dogs. However, in vivo studies are needed determine the effects of increasing ES caliber on clinical outcomes for dogs undergoing these procedures.
确定在狗尸体标本的屈肌腱修复中,腱膜缝线(ES)线径对拉伸强度的影响。
30 只骨骼成熟犬的 60 个尸体指浅屈肌腱(SDFT)。
将标本随机分配到 5 个缝线线径组(每组 12 个 SDFT)。SDFT 经锐性横断后,用 0 号、2-0 号、3-0 号、4-0 号或 5-0 号聚丙烯缝线进行简单连续环形 ES 修复。构建体在 2N 下预加载,并进行失效负载测试。通过统计方法比较各组的屈服、峰值和失效载荷以及失效模式。
SDFT 修复构建体的屈服、峰值和失效载荷与 ES 线径呈正相关,在两两比较中,0 号和 2-0 号线径组之间没有差异。0 号、2-0 号和 3-0 号线径组的屈服载荷明显大于 4-0 号和 5-0 号线径组。0 号和 2-0 号线径组的峰值和失效载荷明显大于其余组。0 号(12/12)、2-0 号(12/12)和 3-0 号(10/12)组的大多数构建体因 ES 拉脱而失效;4-0 号线径组(5/12)的几个构建体和 5-0 号线径组(11/12)的大多数构建体因 ES 断裂而失效。
结果表明,在犬屈肌腱修复中放置 ES 时,应考虑使用 0 号和 2-0 号缝线。然而,需要进行体内研究来确定增加 ES 线径对接受这些手术的犬的临床结果的影响。