Barnes-Harris Matilda Mm, Daniel Sunitha, Venkateswaran Chitra, Hutchinson Ann, Johnson Miriam J
Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Department of Palliative Medicine, General Hospital Ernakulam, Kochi, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):54-61. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_139_20. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Chronic breathlessness syndrome has been defined to help clinicians actively seek, and patients legitimately present with, persistent breathlessness, and to drive services and research. However, views from low- to middle-income countries were not included. We aimed to explore the views of hospital physicians regarding chronic breathlessness syndrome, its recognition and management.
This was a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected during a service development project. Three focus groups of physicians caring for patients with chronic breathlessness in a single tertiary hospital in South India were conducted in English, audio-recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis.
Fifteen physicians from oncology, palliative care, cardiology, and respiratory specialties participated. Three major themes (impact, invisibility, and purpose) were generated. Findings mirrored those in high-income countries. Chronic breathlessness, as defined, was seen as prevalent, with a major impact on patients, families, and physicians. Nonpalliative care physicians described therapeutic helplessness with poor awareness and/or ability to manage breathlessness accompanied by active avoidance. This helplessness, a perceived lack of assessment tools and lack of access to palliative care contributed to the "invisibility" of chronic breathlessness. Most participants agreed with the name of chronic breathlessness syndrome. All agreed that systematic identification would foster education regarding assessment and management and support service development and research.
Chronic breathlessness syndrome is recognized in South India but, as in higher-income countries, risks being invisible due to the lack of awareness of therapeutic interventions. A named and defined syndrome was seen as a way to improve identification and management.
慢性呼吸急促综合征的定义有助于临床医生积极探寻、患者合理呈现持续性呼吸急促的情况,并推动相关服务与研究。然而,低收入和中等收入国家的观点未被纳入其中。我们旨在探讨医院医生对慢性呼吸急促综合征及其识别与管理的看法。
这是对一项服务开发项目中收集的定性数据进行的二次分析。在印度南部一家三级医院,针对照顾慢性呼吸急促患者的医生开展了三个焦点小组讨论,讨论用英语进行,进行了录音、转录,并进行了主题分析。
来自肿瘤学、姑息治疗、心脏病学和呼吸专科的15名医生参与其中。产生了三个主要主题(影响、隐匿性和目的)。研究结果与高收入国家的情况相似。所定义的慢性呼吸急促被视为普遍存在,对患者、家庭和医生都有重大影响。非姑息治疗医生表示存在治疗无助感,对呼吸急促的认识和/或管理能力较差,同时还存在主动回避的情况。这种无助感、评估工具的缺乏以及无法获得姑息治疗导致了慢性呼吸急促的“隐匿性”。大多数参与者认同慢性呼吸急促综合征这一名称。所有人都认为系统识别将促进有关评估和管理的教育,并支持服务开发与研究。
慢性呼吸急促综合征在印度南部得到了认可,但与高收入国家一样,由于对治疗干预缺乏认识,存在被忽视的风险。一个有名称且明确的综合征被视为改善识别和管理的一种方式。