Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Heredity (Edinb). 2021 Aug;127(2):141-150. doi: 10.1038/s41437-021-00445-6. Epub 2021 May 27.
Data on the gut microbiota (GM) of wild animals are key to studies on evolutionary biology (host-GM interactions under natural selection), ecology and conservation biology (GM as a fitness component closely connected to the environment). Wildlife GM sampling often requires non-invasive techniques or sampling from dead animals. In a controlled experiment profiling microbial 16S rRNA in 52 house mice (Mus musculus) from eight families and four genetic backgrounds, we studied the effects of live- and snap-trapping on small mammal GM and evaluated the suitability of microbiota from non-fresh faeces as a proxy for caecal GM. We compared CM from individuals sampled 16-18 h after death with those in live traps and caged controls, and caecal and faecal GM collected from mice in live-traps. Sampling delay did not affect GM composition, validating data from fresh cadavers or snap-trapped animals. Animals trapped overnight displayed a slight but significant difference in GM composition to the caged controls, though the change only had negligible effect on GM diversity, composition and inter-individual divergence. Hence, the trapping process appears not to bias GM profiling. Despite their significant difference, caecal and faecal microbiota were correlated in composition and, to a lesser extent, diversity. Both showed congruent patterns of inter-individual divergence following the natural structure of the dataset. Thus, the faecal microbiome represents a good non-invasive proxy of the caecal microbiome, making it suitable for detecting biologically relevant patterns. However, care should be taken when analysing mixed datasets containing both faecal and caecal samples.
野生动物肠道微生物组(GM)的数据是研究进化生物学(自然选择下的宿主-GM 相互作用)、生态学和保护生物学(GM 作为与环境密切相关的适应度组成部分)的关键。野生动物 GM 采样通常需要非侵入性技术或从死亡动物身上采样。在一项控制实验中,我们对来自 8 个家族和 4 个遗传背景的 52 只家鼠(Mus musculus)的微生物 16S rRNA 进行了分析,研究了活体和 snap 陷阱对小型哺乳动物 GM 的影响,并评估了非新鲜粪便中的微生物群作为盲肠 GM 替代物的适宜性。我们比较了死后 16-18 小时采集的个体的 CM 与活体陷阱和笼养对照个体的 CM,以及从活体陷阱中采集的盲肠和粪便 GM。采样延迟不会影响 GM 组成,这验证了新鲜尸体或 snap 捕获动物的数据的有效性。在夜间被捕获的动物与笼养对照动物的 GM 组成略有但显著的差异,尽管这种变化对 GM 多样性、组成和个体间差异的影响微不足道。因此,捕获过程似乎不会偏向 GM 分析。尽管存在显著差异,但盲肠和粪便微生物组在组成上存在相关性,在一定程度上,在多样性上也存在相关性。两者在组成和个体间差异方面都表现出与自然数据集结构一致的模式。因此,粪便微生物组是盲肠微生物组的良好非侵入性替代物,适合检测具有生物学意义的模式。然而,在分析包含粪便和盲肠样本的混合数据集时,应谨慎操作。