Curtis National Hand Center at MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC.
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Oct;46(10):868-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.04.030. Epub 2021 May 25.
To compare the short-term outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), including patient-reported outcomes, pain and satisfaction scores, return to work, and postoperative prescription pain medication use.
We included all patients over 18 years of age undergoing carpal tunnel release at a single hand center between January 2018 and December 2019. The carpal tunnel release method was driven by variations in surgeon practice. Data from patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) questionnaires and brief Michigan hand outcomes questionnaires and data on patient-reported pain levels, satisfaction with care, return to work, and postoperative prescription pain medication use were collected at preoperative visits and the first follow-up visit between postoperative days 7 and 14.
We included 678 (586 ECTR and 92 OCTR) patients. The median age was 58 years, and 75% of the patients were women. At early follow up, patients who underwent OCTR reported significantly lower postoperative PROMIS upper-extremity scores than those who underwent ECTR (median, 32 vs 36 points, respectively) but similar postoperative PROMIS pain interference, global physical health, global mental health, and brief Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire scores. The postoperative pain and satisfaction scores were similar between the 2 groups. In multivariable models, patients who underwent OCTR had 62% lower odds of returning to work and 30% greater odds of remaining on a postoperative pain prescription at the first follow-up visit.
This study found no evidence suggesting the definitive superiority of 1 surgical technique with regard to clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period. However, OCTR was associated with lower postoperative PROMIS upper-extremity scores of unclear clinical significance, higher odds of remaining on pain medication, and lower odds of returning to work by the first postoperative visit. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release may be preferred in patients who need to return to work within the first 2 weeks after the procedure.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
比较内镜腕管松解术(ECTR)与开放式腕管松解术(OCTR)的短期疗效,包括患者报告的结局、疼痛和满意度评分、重返工作岗位以及术后处方止痛药的使用情况。
我们纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在一家手部中心接受腕管松解术的所有 18 岁以上患者。腕管松解术的方法由术者的操作习惯决定。从患者报告的结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)问卷和简明密歇根手部结果问卷中收集数据,以及患者报告的疼痛程度、对治疗的满意度、重返工作岗位以及术后处方止痛药使用情况的数据,在术前访视和术后 7 至 14 天的第一次随访时进行收集。
我们纳入了 678 例(586 例 ECTR 和 92 例 OCTR)患者。患者的中位年龄为 58 岁,75%为女性。在早期随访时,接受 OCTR 的患者报告的术后 PROMIS 上肢评分明显低于接受 ECTR 的患者(中位数分别为 32 分和 36 分),但术后 PROMIS 疼痛干扰、总体身体健康、总体心理健康和简明密歇根手部结果问卷评分相似。两组患者的术后疼痛和满意度评分相似。在多变量模型中,接受 OCTR 的患者重返工作岗位的可能性降低 62%,而在第一次随访时继续使用术后止痛药的可能性增加 30%。
本研究未发现有证据表明在术后早期,任何一种手术技术在临床结局方面具有明确的优势。然而,OCTR 与术后 PROMIS 上肢评分降低(其临床意义不明确)、继续使用止痛药的可能性增加以及术后第一次随访时重返工作岗位的可能性降低相关。对于需要在手术后 2 周内重返工作岗位的患者,内镜腕管松解术可能更受欢迎。
研究类型/证据等级:治疗性 IV 级。