• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国儿科脑死亡判定规程的差异

Variability in Pediatric Brain Death Determination Protocols in the United States.

作者信息

Francoeur Conall, Weiss Matthew J, MacDonald Jennifer M, Press Craig, Greer David M, Berg Robert A, Topjian Alexis A, Morrison Wynne, Kirschen Matthew P

机构信息

From Université Laval Research Center (C.F., M.J.W.), CHU de Québec Université Laval, Canada; Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (J.M.M.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; Department of Pediatrics (C.P.), Section of Neurology, University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (D.M.G.), Boston University, MA; and Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (R.A.B., A.A.T., W.M., M.P.K.), Pediatrics (R.A.B., A.A.T., W.M., M.P.K.), and Neurology (M.P.K.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Neurology. 2021 Jul 19;97(3):e310-e319. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012225.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012225
PMID:34050004
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the variability in pediatric death by neurologic criteria (DNC) protocols between US pediatric institutions and compared to the 2011 DNC guidelines.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study of DNC protocols obtained from pediatric institutions in the United States via regional organ procurement organizations, protocols were evaluated across 5 domains: general DNC procedures, prerequisites, neurologic examination, apnea testing, and ancillary testing. Descriptive statistics compared protocols to each other and the 2011 guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 130 protocols were analyzed with 118 dated after publication of the 2011 guidelines. Of those 118 protocols, identification of a mechanism of irreversible brain injury was required in 97%, while 67% required an observation period after acute brain injury before DNC evaluation. Most protocols required guideline-based prerequisites such as exclusion of hypotension (94%), hypothermia (97%), and metabolic derangements (92%). On neurologic examination, 91% required a lack of responsiveness, 93% no response to noxious stimuli, and 99% loss of brainstem reflexes. A total of 84% of protocols required the guideline-recommended 2 apnea tests. CO targets were consistent with guidelines in 64%. Contrary to guidelines, 15% required ancillary testing for all patients and 15% permitted ancillary studies that are not validated in pediatrics.

CONCLUSION

Variability exists between pediatric institutional DNC protocols in all domains of DNC determination, especially with respect to apnea and ancillary testing. Better alignment of DNC protocols with national guidelines may improve the consistency and accuracy of DNC determination.

摘要

目的

确定美国儿科机构间基于神经学标准的儿科死亡(DNC)方案的差异,并与2011年DNC指南进行比较。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,通过区域器官采购组织从美国儿科机构获取DNC方案,对方案在5个领域进行评估:一般DNC程序、先决条件、神经学检查、呼吸暂停测试和辅助测试。描述性统计将各方案相互比较,并与2011年指南进行比较。

结果

共分析了130个方案,其中118个方案的日期在2011年指南发布之后。在这118个方案中,97%要求确定不可逆脑损伤机制,而67%要求在急性脑损伤后有一个观察期才能进行DNC评估。大多数方案要求基于指南的先决条件,如排除低血压(94%)、体温过低(97%)和代谢紊乱(92%)。在神经学检查方面,91%要求无反应性,93%要求对有害刺激无反应,99%要求脑干反射消失。共有84%的方案要求进行指南推荐的2次呼吸暂停测试。64%的方案中二氧化碳目标与指南一致。与指南相反,15%要求对所有患者进行辅助测试,15%允许进行在儿科未经验证的辅助研究。

结论

儿科机构DNC方案在DNC判定的所有领域均存在差异,尤其是在呼吸暂停和辅助测试方面。使DNC方案更好地与国家指南保持一致,可能会提高DNC判定的一致性和准确性。

相似文献

1
Variability in Pediatric Brain Death Determination Protocols in the United States.美国儿科脑死亡判定规程的差异
Neurology. 2021 Jul 19;97(3):e310-e319. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012225.
2
The 2023 American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Pediatrics, Child Neurology Society, and Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination Consensus Guidelines: What the Critical Care Team Needs to Know.2023 年美国神经病学学会、美国儿科学会、儿童神经病学会和危重病医学会儿科和成人脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡共识指南:危重病团队需要了解的内容。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;52(3):376-386. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006099. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡。
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2021 Oct 1;27(5):1444-1464. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000987.
4
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: The World Brain Death Project.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡:世界脑死亡项目。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1078-1097. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11586.
5
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Countries in Asia and the Pacific.亚洲及太平洋地区各国脑死亡/基于神经学标准判定死亡的情况
J Clin Neurol. 2020 Jul;16(3):480-490. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.3.480.
6
Determination of death by neurologic criteria around the world.全球范围内通过神经学标准判断死亡。
Neurology. 2020 Jul 21;95(3):e299-e309. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009888. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Verification of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Survey of 12 Organ Procurement Organizations Across the United States.通过神经学标准确认死亡:对美国 12 个器官获取组织的调查。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec;41(3):847-854. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02001-6. Epub 2024 May 15.
8
Clinical evaluation and ancillary testing for the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian intensivists.通过神经标准诊断死亡的临床评估和辅助检查:加拿大重症监护医师的横断面调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;69(3):353-363. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02166-0. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Consensus Guideline.儿科和成人脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡的共识指南。
Neurology. 2023 Dec 12;101(24):1112-1132. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207740. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
A Review of Practices Around Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria by an Organ Procurement Organization in the WAMI Region.对WAMI地区一个器官采购组织关于神经学标准判定死亡实践的综述。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;12(5):336-343. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200077.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextualizing India's Medicolegal Controversies Related to Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: Regulation, Religion, and Resource Allocation.将印度与脑死亡/神经病学标准判定的死亡相关的法医学争议置于背景之中:监管、宗教与资源分配
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02300-6.
2
Hypoxic-ischemic spinal cord injury following resuscitated cardiac arrest: a case series and rapid literature review.心脏骤停复苏后发生的缺氧缺血性脊髓损伤:病例系列及快速文献综述
Can J Anaesth. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02937-z.
3
States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination.
各州并未划定脑死亡/基于神经学标准判定死亡的“公认医学标准”。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02209-6. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
4
Verification of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Survey of 12 Organ Procurement Organizations Across the United States.通过神经学标准确认死亡:对美国 12 个器官获取组织的调查。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec;41(3):847-854. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02001-6. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
New developments in guidelines for brain death/death by neurological criteria.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡指南的新进展。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Mar;20(3):151-161. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00929-z. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
The 2023 AAN/AAP/CNS/SCCM Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Consensus Practice Guideline: A Comparison With the 2010 and 2011 Guidelines.《2023年美国神经病学学会/美国儿科学会/美国神经外科医师协会/危重病医学会儿科与成人大脑死亡/神经病学标准判定死亡共识实践指南:与2010年和2011年指南的比较》
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;13(6):e200189. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200189. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
7
Enhancing Understanding and Overcoming Barriers in Brain Death Determination Using Standardized Education: A Call to Action.利用标准化教育增进对脑死亡判定的理解并克服障碍:行动呼吁
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01775-5. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
Quality improvement in the determination of death by neurologic criteria around the world.全球范围内神经标准判定死亡的质量改进。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 21;27(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04373-1.