Suppr超能文献

HPV 阴性口咽鳞状细胞癌的肿瘤学结局的配对分析:经口手术与放疗或同期放化疗比较。

A matched pair analysis of oncological outcomes in human papillomavirus-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Transoral surgery versus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2021 Oct;43(10):2896-2906. doi: 10.1002/hed.26771. Epub 2021 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the termination of RTOG 1221, there remains a lacuna regarding the optimal treatment for human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

Matched pair analysis with propensity score matching (PSM) between Arm I (transoral surgery [TOS] + risk-stratified adjuvant treatment) and Arm II (nonsurgical treatment - radiation/chemoradiation) in HPV(-) OPSCC.

RESULTS

Unmatched comparison of Arm I (n = 57) and Arm II (n = 89) indicated significantly better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for Arm I. PSM by matched pairs (n = 48, 24 each arm) indicated 5-year OS at 80% and 72.1%, respectively, for Arm I and II (p > 0.05) and corresponding DFS at 65.3% and 33.4% (p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate statistical difference in outcomes in stage II and III, but stage IV tumors had significantly better outcomes in Arm I than Arm II (4-year OS: 100% vs. 21%, p = 0.04; DFS: 75% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

TOS +/- adjuvant was found to have oncological outcomes at par with nonsurgical modalities in stage I-III OPSCC, whereas a distinct survival advantage was noted in case of stage IV tumors.

摘要

背景

随着 RTOG 1221 的结束,对于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阴性口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的最佳治疗方法仍存在空白。

方法

对 HPV(-)OPSCC 中 Arm I(经口手术[TOS]+风险分层辅助治疗)和 Arm II(非手术治疗-放疗/放化疗)进行 I 臂(n=57)和 II 臂(n=89)的匹配对分析,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

未经匹配的 Arm I(n=57)和 Arm II(n=89)的比较表明,Arm I 的总体生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)显著更好。通过匹配对(n=48,每组 24 例)进行 PSM 后,5 年 OS 分别为 Arm I 和 II 的 80%和 72.1%(p>0.05),相应的 DFS 为 65.3%和 33.4%(p>0.05)。亚组分析显示,在 II 期和 III 期,结果无统计学差异,但 IV 期肿瘤的 Arm I 治疗结果明显优于 Arm II(4 年 OS:100% vs. 21%,p=0.04;DFS:75% vs. 14.3%,p=0.04)。

结论

在 I-III 期 OPSCC 中,TOS +/-辅助治疗与非手术治疗方式的肿瘤学结果相当,而在 IV 期肿瘤中,明显具有生存优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验