Suppr超能文献

外引流微管植入术与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼:一项为期 2 年的随机、多中心研究的 1 年结果。

Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: One-Year Results from a 2-Year Randomized, Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Ophthalmic Surgeons and Consultants of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio.

Specialty Eyecare Centre, Bellevue, Washington.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 May 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of the MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

DESIGN

One-year results from a 2-year, prospective, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority study (NCT01881425) conducted in the United States and Europe.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients were aged 40-85 years with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥15 and ≤40 mmHg and mild-to-severe POAG inadequately controlled on maximum tolerated medical therapy.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 3:1 to undergo stand-alone MicroShunt implantation or trabeculectomy, both performed with adjunctive mitomycin C (0.2 mg/ml for 2 minutes).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary effectiveness end point was surgical success, defined as ≥20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP from baseline (no medication washout) at year 1 without increasing the number of glaucoma medications. Secondary effectiveness end points at year 1 were the mean IOP change from baseline and requirement for postoperative intervention. Additional end points included glaucoma medication use and adverse events.

RESULTS

Overall, 395 (MicroShunt) and 132 (trabeculectomy) patients were randomized (mean Humphrey visual field mean deviation, -12.34 decibels [dB]). At year 1, probability of success was lower in the MicroShunt group compared with the trabeculectomy group (53.9% vs. 72.7%, respectively; P < 0.01). In the MicroShunt group, mean IOP ± standard deviation decreased from 21.1 ± 4.9 mmHg at baseline to 14.3 ± 4.3 mmHg (-29.1%; P < 0.01) at year 1, with a mean of 0.6 ± 1.1 glaucoma medications (baseline 3.1 ± 1.0; P < 0.01). In the trabeculectomy group, mean IOP decreased from 21.1 ± 5.0 mmHg to 11.1 ± 4.3 mmHg (-45.4%; P < 0.01), with a mean of 0.3 ± 0.9 glaucoma medications (baseline 3.0 ± 0.9; P < 0.01). Postoperative interventions, including laser suture lysis, were reported in 40.8% (MicroShunt) versus 67.4% (trabeculectomy) of patients (P < 0.01). Reported incidence of transient hypotony was higher in the trabeculectomy group versus the MicroShunt group (49.6% vs. 28.9%; P < 0.01). Vision-threatening complications were uncommon and reported in 1.0% of MicroShunt versus 0.8% of trabeculectomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Probability of success was lower with MicroShunt compared with trabeculectomy. Although reductions in IOP and glaucoma medications over 1 year were observed in both groups, the trabeculectomy group had a lower mean IOP on fewer medications.

摘要

目的

比较 MicroShunt 与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的效果和安全性。

设计

在美国和欧洲进行的一项为期 2 年、前瞻性、随机、多中心、非劣效性研究(NCT01881425)的 1 年结果。

参与者

符合条件的患者年龄在 40-85 岁之间,眼压(IOP)≥15mmHg 且≤40mmHg,经最大耐受药物治疗后轻度至重度 POAG 控制不佳。

方法

患者按 3:1 随机分为单独接受 MicroShunt 植入或小梁切除术组,两组均联合使用丝裂霉素 C(0.2mg/ml,持续 2 分钟)。

主要观察指标

主要有效性终点为手术成功率,定义为第 1 年时日间平均眼压较基线降低≥20%(无药物洗脱),同时不增加青光眼药物使用数量。第 1 年的次要有效性终点为平均眼压变化和术后干预需求。其他终点包括青光眼药物使用和不良事件。

结果

总体而言,395 例(MicroShunt 组)和 132 例(小梁切除术组)患者被随机分组(平均 Humphrey 视野平均偏差,-12.34 分贝[dB])。第 1 年时,MicroShunt 组的成功率低于小梁切除术组(分别为 53.9%和 72.7%;P<0.01)。在 MicroShunt 组中,平均眼压±标准差从基线时的 21.1±4.9mmHg 降至第 1 年时的 14.3±4.3mmHg(-29.1%;P<0.01),平均使用 0.6±1.1 种青光眼药物(基线时为 3.1±1.0;P<0.01)。在小梁切除术组中,平均眼压从 21.1±5.0mmHg 降至 11.1±4.3mmHg(-45.4%;P<0.01),平均使用 0.3±0.9 种青光眼药物(基线时为 3.0±0.9;P<0.01)。包括激光缝线松解在内的术后干预在 40.8%(MicroShunt 组)和 67.4%(小梁切除术组)的患者中报告(P<0.01)。小梁切除术组报告短暂性低眼压的发生率高于 MicroShunt 组(分别为 49.6%和 28.9%;P<0.01)。视力威胁性并发症罕见,在 MicroShunt 组和小梁切除术组中分别报告了 1.0%和 0.8%的患者。

结论

MicroShunt 组的手术成功率低于小梁切除术组。尽管两组患者在 1 年内的眼压和青光眼药物均有下降,但小梁切除术组的平均眼压更低,用药更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验