Mackey Ethan R, Riemann Bryan L
Biodynamics and Human Performance Center, Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Apr 1;14(1):533-543. doi: 10.70252/CIYT8956. eCollection 2021.
The Bulgarian split squat (BSS) is a unilateral lower extremity strength exercise; however, the mechanical demands have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare ankle, knee, and hip joint net joint moment impulse (NJMI), work (NJW), peak net joint moment (NJM) and peak displacement between the BSS and traditional bilateral back squat (BS). Following a practice and 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) session, 2x3 BS (70% 1-RM) and BSS (35% 1-RM) were completed by twenty resistance trained males (24.20 ± 2.50 yrs, 1.76 ± 0.06m, 85.3 ± 13.90 kg). Significant squat type x joint interactions were revealed for NJMI ( < 0.001), NJW ( < 0.001), peak NJM ( < 0.001), and peak displacement ( = 0.011). For both squats, hip NJMI, NJW, and peak NJM was significantly greater than both ankle ( = 5.50-9.40) and knee ( = 7.50-8.50). While knee NJMI ( = 2.80) and peak NJM ( = 2.10) during the BSS was statistically less compared to ankle, during BS knee NJMI was statistically greater than ankle ( = 3.00). Ankle and knee NJW were statistically similar during BSS ( = 0.30), whereas knee NJW was statistically greater than ankle during BS ( = 3.20). Comparing between squat types within each joint demonstrated statistically equal peak displacement for the ankle ( 0.14) and hip ( = 0.11), whereas knee joint peak displacement was significantly less for the BSS compared to BS ( = 0.82). Both the BSS and BS are hip dominant exercises. The BSS may best be used in circumstances to focus on hip extension while minimizing the knee joint demands, such as the early phases of knee rehabilitation or when addressing isolated hip extension deficiencies.
保加利亚分腿蹲(BSS)是一种单侧下肢力量训练动作;然而,其力学需求尚未完全阐明。本研究的目的是比较BSS与传统双侧后蹲(BS)在踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的净关节力矩冲量(NJMI)、功(NJW)、峰值净关节力矩(NJM)以及峰值位移。在进行一次练习和一次重复最大值(1-RM)测试后,20名经过阻力训练的男性(24.20±2.50岁,身高1.76±0.06米,体重85.3±13.90千克)完成了两组每组3次的BS(70% 1-RM)和BSS(35% 1-RM)训练。结果显示,NJMI(<0.001)、NJW(<0.001)、峰值NJM(<0.001)和峰值位移(=0.011)存在显著的蹲姿类型×关节交互作用。对于两种蹲姿,髋关节的NJMI、NJW和峰值NJM均显著大于踝关节(=5.50 - 9.40)和膝关节(=7.50 - 8.50)。虽然BSS期间膝关节的NJMI(=2.80)和峰值NJM(=2.10)在统计学上低于踝关节,但在BS期间膝关节的NJMI在统计学上大于踝关节(=3.00)。BSS期间踝关节和膝关节的NJW在统计学上相似(=0.30),而BS期间膝关节的NJW在统计学上大于踝关节(=3.20)。比较每个关节在不同蹲姿类型之间的情况,踝关节(=0.14)和髋关节(=0.11)的峰值位移在统计学上相等,而BSS时膝关节的峰值位移相比BS显著更小(=0.82)。BSS和BS都是以髋关节为主导的训练动作。BSS可能最适用于专注于髋关节伸展同时尽量减少膝关节需求的情况,例如在膝关节康复的早期阶段或解决孤立的髋关节伸展不足问题时。