Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Med Educ. 2021 Oct;55(10):1205-1213. doi: 10.1111/medu.14572. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
Despite its widespread application in medical education, belonging to a single community of practice does not reflect the overall experience of physician-educators. Knowing how physician-educators find their way among different communities of practice (ie their landscape of practice) has implications for professional development but the limited description in the literature. In this longitudinal qualitative research, we explored how physicians who pursue graduate degrees in medical education navigate their landscape of practice.
11/29 physicians in one cohort of a masters in medical education programme were interviewed annually from 2016 (programme start) to 2020 (2 years post-graduation). We iteratively collected and analysed data, creating inductive codes and categorising coded data by mode of identification (engagement, imagination, alignment) and time. We organised narratives into time-ordered data matrices so that final analysis wove together mode, time and participant.
All participants consistently spoke of navigating their landscape of practice, which included the community created in the graduate programme; but that single community 'doesn't define the journey itself'. They shifted engagement from teaching individual learners to translating what they learned in the graduate programme to develop educational projects and produce scholarship. They shifted the imagination from relying on internal and external assessments to experience-inspired versions of their future self. And they shifted alignment from belonging to the graduate programme's community of practice, then belonging to different communities in their landscape of practice and ultimately focussing on communities that mattered most to them.
Physicians in a graduate programme in medical education navigated their dynamic landscape of practice by shifting how they engaged in medical education, as well as what they imagined and who they aligned with as physician-educators. Our work offers novel insights into how knowledgeability emerges through time as overlapping modes of identification.
尽管它在医学教育中被广泛应用,但属于单一的实践共同体并不能反映医师教育者的整体经验。了解医师教育者如何在不同的实践共同体(即实践领域)中找到自己的方向,对专业发展有影响,但文献中的描述有限。在这项纵向定性研究中,我们探讨了攻读医学教育硕士学位的医生如何在他们的实践领域中找到自己的方向。
在一个医学教育硕士课程的队列中,我们对 11/29 名医生进行了每年一次的访谈,时间从 2016 年(课程开始)到 2020 年(毕业后 2 年)。我们不断地收集和分析数据,创建归纳性代码,并按识别模式(参与、想象、对齐)和时间对编码数据进行分类。我们将叙事组织成按时间顺序排列的数据矩阵,以便最终的分析将模式、时间和参与者编织在一起。
所有参与者都一致地谈到了在他们的实践领域中寻找自己的方向,这包括在研究生课程中创建的社区;但那个单一的社区“并不能定义整个旅程”。他们将参与从个别学习者的教学转变为将他们在研究生课程中所学的知识转化为发展教育项目和产生学术成果。他们将想象从依赖内部和外部评估转变为基于经验的对自己未来的想象。他们将对齐从属于研究生课程的实践共同体转变为属于他们的实践领域中的不同共同体,最终专注于对他们最重要的共同体。
医学教育研究生课程中的医生通过转变他们参与医学教育的方式,以及他们想象和认同的对象,来驾驭他们动态的实践领域。我们的工作提供了新颖的见解,即知识是如何通过时间作为重叠的认同模式而出现的。