Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 19;18(10):5408. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105408.
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a novel chest compression (CC) smart-ring-based feedback system in a manikin simulation. In this randomized, crossover, controlled study, we evaluated the effect of smart-ring CC feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The learnability and usability of the tool were evaluated with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Participants were divided into two groups and each performed CCs with and without feedback 2 weeks apart, using different orders. The primary outcome was compression depth; the proportion of accurate-depth (5-6 cm) CCs, CC rate, and the proportion of complete CCs (≤1 cm of residual leaning) were assessed additionally. The feedback group and the non-feedback group showed significant differences in compression depth (52.1 (46.3-54.8) vs. 47.1 (40.5-49.9) mm, = 0.021). The proportion of accurate-depth CCs was significantly higher in the interventional than in the control condition (88.7 (30.0-99.1) vs. 22.6 (0.0-58.5%), = 0.033). The mean SUS score was 83.9 ± 8.7 points. The acceptability ranges were 'acceptable', and the adjective rating was 'excellent'. CCs with smart-ring feedback could help achieve the ideal range of depth during CPR. The smart-ring may be a valuable source of CPR feedback.
本研究旨在评估一种新型基于胸部按压(CC)智能指环反馈系统在模拟人体中的有效性。在这项随机、交叉、对照研究中,我们评估了智能指环 CC 反馈对心肺复苏(CPR)的影响。使用系统可用性量表(SUS)评估工具的可学习性和可用性。参与者分为两组,每组在相隔 2 周的时间内以不同的顺序进行有反馈和无反馈的 CC 按压,评估主要结局为按压深度;准确深度(5-6cm)CC 的比例、CC 频率以及完全 CC 的比例(≤1cm 的残余倾斜)。反馈组和无反馈组的按压深度有显著差异(52.1(46.3-54.8)比 47.1(40.5-49.9)mm, = 0.021)。干预组的准确深度 CC 比例明显高于对照组(88.7(30.0-99.1)比 22.6(0.0-58.5)%, = 0.033)。SUS 平均得分为 83.9±8.7 分。可接受范围为“可接受”,形容词评级为“优秀”。带有智能指环反馈的 CC 按压有助于在 CPR 期间达到理想的深度范围。智能指环可能是 CPR 反馈的有价值的来源。