Suppr超能文献

通过粪便培养和实时荧光定量PCR检测混合粪便样本中的亚种与细菌密度的关系

Detection of Subspecies in Pooled Fecal Samples by Fecal Culture and Real-Time PCR in Relation to Bacterial Density.

作者信息

Wichert Annika, Einax Esra, Hahn Natalie, Klassen Anne, Donat Karsten

机构信息

Animal Health Service, Thuringian Animal Diseases Fund, Victor-Goerttler-Straße 4, 07745 Jena, Germany.

Veterinary Office, Johannesstraße 173, 99084 Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 May 29;11(6):1605. doi: 10.3390/ani11061605.

Abstract

Within paratuberculosis control programs subsp. (MAP)-infected herds have to be detected with minimum effort but with sufficient reliability. We aimed to evaluate a combination of random sampling (RS) and pooling for the detection of MAP-infected herds, simulating repeated RS in imitated dairy herds (within-herd prevalence 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.3%). Each RS consisted of taking 80 out of 300 pretested fecal samples, and five or ten samples were repeatedly and randomly pooled. All pools containing at least one MAP-positive sample were analyzed by culture and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The pool detection probability was 47.0% or 45.9% for pools of size 5 or 10 applying qPCR and slightly lower using culture. Combining these methods increased the pool detection probability. A positive association between bacterial density in pools and pool detection probability was identified by logistic regression. The herd-level detection probability ranged from 67.3% to 84.8% for pools of size 10 analyzed by both qPCR and culture. Pools of size 10 can be used without significant loss of sensitivity compared with pools of size 5. Analyzing randomly sampled and pooled fecal samples allows the detection of MAP-infected herds, but is not recommended for one-time testing in low prevalence herds.

摘要

在副结核控制项目中,必须以最小的工作量但足够可靠地检测出感染副结核分枝杆菌亚种(MAP)的牛群。我们旨在评估随机抽样(RS)和混合检测相结合的方法,用于检测感染MAP的牛群,在模拟奶牛群(牛群内患病率分别为1.0%、2.0%、4.3%)中模拟重复随机抽样。每次随机抽样包括从300份预先检测的粪便样本中抽取80份,将5份或10份样本反复随机混合。对所有含有至少一份MAP阳性样本的混合样本进行培养和实时定量PCR(qPCR)分析。对于大小为5或10的混合样本,应用qPCR时混合样本检测概率为47.0%或45.9%,使用培养法时略低。将这些方法结合起来可提高混合样本检测概率。通过逻辑回归确定了混合样本中细菌密度与混合样本检测概率之间的正相关关系。对于通过qPCR和培养法分析的大小为10的混合样本,牛群水平的检测概率在67.3%至84.8%之间。与大小为5的混合样本相比,大小为10的混合样本在使用时不会显著降低敏感性。分析随机抽样和混合的粪便样本能够检测出感染MAP的牛群,但不建议在低患病率牛群中进行一次性检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7d5/8229432/8a59eb2d24b0/animals-11-01605-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验