Suppr超能文献

雷美替胺治疗失眠:使用治疗人数、危害人数和获益或危害可能性,对其与其他催眠药物的直接和间接比较。

Lemborexant for the Treatment of Insomnia: Direct and Indirect Comparisons With Other Hypnotics Using Number Needed to Treat, Number Needed to Harm, and Likelihood to Be Helped or Harmed.

机构信息

New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.

Corresponding author: Leslie Citrome, MD, MPH, 11 Medical Park Drive, Ste 102, Pomona, NY 10970 (

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 1;82:20m13795. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13795.

Abstract

To describe lemborexant for the treatment of insomnia () in adults using number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH). Lemborexant data were obtained from two Phase 3 trials conducted 2016-2018. Efficacy was assessed using different categorical definitions for response, and tolerability was assessed by evaluating rates of adverse events (AEs). Direct comparisons were made with zolpidem extended release (ER), and indirect comparisons were made with other hypnotic agents, including suvorexant, doxepin, ramelteon, zolpidem immediate release, eszopiclone, zaleplon, and selected benzodiazepines, using data from published reports and regulatory documents. Lemborexant had a clinically relevant magnitude of therapeutic effect, as evidenced by NNT values versus placebo as robust as 3 (95% CI, 2-3). In general, NNH values for lemborexant versus placebo were ≥ 10, suggesting that lemborexant is relatively tolerable. Somnolence was the most common AE, with NNH estimates of 28 (95% CI, 18-61) and 15 (95% CI, 11-22) for lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg, respectively. Rates of discontinuation of lemborexant because of an AE were low, and for lemborexant 5 mg the rate was lower than that for placebo. LHH contrasting the statistically significant endpoint efficacy measures versus discontinuation because of an AE ranged from 13 to 54. NNT values for lemborexant were generally more robust than for zolpidem ER for the polysomnography and sleep diary outcomes. In indirect comparisons, NNT data for the other hypnotics demonstrated effect sizes that were generally similar to those for lemborexant. In Phase 3 trials, the benefit-risk ratio for lemborexant is favorable as measured by NNT, NNH, and LHH. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02783729, NCT02952820.

摘要

使用需要治疗的人数(NNT)、需要伤害的人数(NNH)和可能受益或受害的可能性(LHH)来描述雷美替胺治疗成人失眠症()。雷美替胺的数据来自于 2016 年至 2018 年进行的两项 3 期试验。使用不同的反应分类定义评估疗效,通过评估不良事件(AE)发生率评估耐受性。与佐匹克隆缓释剂(zolpidem extended release,ER)进行直接比较,并通过使用来自已发表报告和监管文件的数据与其他催眠药物(包括苏沃雷生、多塞平、拉米替隆、佐匹克隆即时释放、艾司佐匹克隆、扎来普隆和选定的苯二氮䓬类药物)进行间接比较。雷美替胺具有临床相关的治疗效果,这一点从 NNT 值与安慰剂的对比可以明显看出,NNT 值为 3(95%CI,2-3)。一般来说,雷美替胺与安慰剂相比的 NNH 值≥10,表明雷美替胺相对耐受。最常见的 AE 是嗜睡,雷美替胺 5mg 和 10mg 的 NNH 估计值分别为 28(95%CI,18-61)和 15(95%CI,11-22)。由于 AE 而停止使用雷美替胺的比例较低,雷美替胺 5mg 的比例低于安慰剂。与因 AE 而停止治疗的统计学显著终点疗效措施相比,雷美替胺的 LHH 范围为 13 至 54。雷美替胺的 NNT 值通常比佐匹克隆 ER 的 NNT 值更稳健,尤其是在多导睡眠图和睡眠日记的结果方面。在间接比较中,其他催眠药物的 NNT 数据表明,这些药物的疗效大小与雷美替胺相似。在 3 期试验中,雷美替胺的受益风险比通过 NNT、NNH 和 LHH 来衡量是有利的。临床试验标识符:NCT02783729,NCT02952820。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验