Yang Hui, Lu Ying, Xu Zhuohua, Wei Mingjing, Huang Haixin
Department of Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2021 May-Aug;9(2):125-134. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_471_20. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
A well-established first-line chemotherapy standard for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma is yet lacking.
To compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus platinum versus docetaxel plus platinum regimen as first-line therapies for distal metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
A single center, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study. The study included 120 patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who met the study requirements.
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio through a sealed envelope selection. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m/d intravenously (IV) for >30 min (days 1 and 8) or docetaxel 75 mg/m/d IV for 1 h (day 1) were administered to the respective group participants. Nedaplatin 75 mg/m/d, IV (day 1), cisplatin 75 mg/m/d IV (day 1) or carboplatin (area under the curve set as 5) IV (day 1) were used in both groups. One cycle duration was 21 days, with 4-6 cycles for all participants.
The primary assessed outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were short-term efficacy [i.e., response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR)] and safety.
Seven patients withdrew from the study, and efficacy and adverse reactions were obtained for 113 patients (gemcitabine: 56; docetaxel: 57). Compared with the docetaxel plus platinum group, the gemcitabine plus platinum group had significantly higher RR (71.4% vs. 52.6%, < 0.05); mPFS (9.7 vs. 7.8 months, < 0.05), and mOS (20.6 vs. 16.8 months, < 0.01). The significance was not associated with increased adverse reactions, as both groups showed similar Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions ( > 0.05). DCR was non-significantly higher in the gemcitabine group (85.7% vs. 75.4%, > 0.05). Multivariable analysis revealed that time to disease progression, number of involved organs, liver metastasis, and grouping were associated with mPFS and mOS (all < 0.05).
The combination of gemcitabine with platinum is likely superior to that of docetaxel with platinum as first-line treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
目前仍缺乏成熟的转移性鼻咽癌一线化疗标准。
比较吉西他滨联合铂类与多西他赛联合铂类方案作为远处转移性鼻咽癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
一项单中心、随机、开放标签、平行组研究。该研究纳入了120例符合研究要求的转移性鼻咽癌患者。
通过密封信封选择法将参与者按1:1比例随机分组。分别给两组参与者静脉注射吉西他滨1000mg/m²/天,持续>30分钟(第1天和第8天)或多西他赛75mg/m²/天,持续1小时(第1天)。两组均使用奈达铂75mg/m²/天,静脉注射(第1天)、顺铂75mg/m²/天,静脉注射(第1天)或卡铂(曲线下面积设定为5),静脉注射(第1天)。一个周期时长为21天,所有参与者均接受4 - 6个周期治疗。
主要评估结果为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),次要结果为短期疗效[即缓解率(RR)和疾病控制率(DCR)]及安全性。
7例患者退出研究,对113例患者(吉西他滨组:56例;多西他赛组:57例)进行了疗效和不良反应评估。与多西他赛联合铂类组相比,吉西他滨联合铂类组的RR显著更高(71.4%对52.6%,P<0.05);中位PFS(9.7个月对7.8个月,P<0.05),以及中位OS(20.6个月对16.8个月,P<0.01)。差异与不良反应增加无关,因为两组3级和4级不良反应相似(P>0.05)。吉西他滨组的DCR略高,但无统计学意义(85.7%对75.4%,P>0.05)。多变量分析显示,疾病进展时间、受累器官数量、肝转移和分组与中位PFS和中位OS相关(均P<0.05)。
对于转移性鼻咽癌的一线治疗,吉西他滨联合铂类可能优于多西他赛联合铂类。