Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
USDA-ARS U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jul 27;87(16):e0075021. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00750-21.
Manure storage methods can affect the concentration and prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in cattle manure prior to land application. The objective of this study was to compare stockpiling and composting with respect to their effectiveness in reducing ARB and ARGs in beef cattle manure in a field-scale study. Field experiments were conducted in different seasons with different bulking agents for composting. For both the winter-spring cycle and the summer-fall cycle, ARB concentrations declined below the limit of quantification rapidly in both composting piles and stockpiles; however, ARB prevalence was significantly greater in the composting piles than in the stockpiles. This was likely due to the introduction of ARB from bulking agents. There was no significant change in ARG concentrations between initial and final concentrations for either manure storage treatment during the winter-spring cycle, but a significant reduction of the ARGs (B), (O), and (Q) over time was observed for both the composting pile and stockpile during the summer-fall cycle. Results from this study suggest that (i) bulking agent may be an important source of ARB and ARGs for composting; (ii) during cold months, the heterogeneity of the temperature profile in composting piles could result in poor ARG reduction; and (iii) during warm months, both stockpiling and composting can be effective in reducing ARG abundance. Proper treatment of manure is essential to reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance and protect human health. Stockpiling and composting are two manure storage methods which can reduce antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance genes, although few field-scale studies have examined the relative efficiency of each method. This study examined the ability of both methods in both winter-spring and summer-fall cycles, while also accounting for heterogeneity within field-scale manure piles. This study determined that bulking agents used in composting could contribute antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance genes. Additionally, seasonal variation could hinder the efficacy of composting in colder months due to heterogeneity in temperature within the pile; however, in warmer months, either method of manure storage could be effective in reducing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
粪便储存方式会影响土地应用前牛粪中抗生素耐药菌(ARB)和抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的浓度和流行率。本研究的目的是比较堆肥和堆肥在减少牛肉粪便中 ARB 和 ARGs 方面的效果,这是一项田间规模的研究。在不同季节,用不同的膨松剂进行了堆肥田间试验。对于冬春循环和夏秋循环,ARB 浓度在堆肥堆和堆肥中都迅速下降到低于定量限;然而,ARB 流行率在堆肥堆中显著高于堆肥中。这可能是由于膨松剂引入了 ARB。在冬春循环中,无论是粪便储存处理,初始浓度和最终浓度之间的 ARG 浓度都没有显著变化,但在夏秋循环中,堆肥堆和堆肥中的 ARGs(B)、(O)和(Q)随着时间的推移都显著减少。本研究结果表明:(i)膨松剂可能是堆肥中 ARB 和 ARGs 的重要来源;(ii)在寒冷月份,堆肥堆中温度分布的异质性可能导致 ARG 减少效果不佳;(iii)在温暖月份,堆肥和堆肥都能有效减少 ARG 丰度。适当处理粪便对于减少抗生素耐药性的传播和保护人类健康至关重要。堆肥和堆肥是两种粪便储存方法,可以减少抗生素耐药菌和耐药基因,尽管很少有田间规模的研究检查过每种方法的相对效率。本研究在冬春和夏秋循环中检查了这两种方法的能力,同时考虑了田间规模粪便堆内的异质性。本研究确定,堆肥中使用的膨松剂可能会带来抗生素耐药菌和耐药基因。此外,由于堆内温度的异质性,季节性变化可能会在较冷的月份阻碍堆肥的效果;然而,在较暖的月份,粪便储存的任何一种方法都可以有效地减少抗生素耐药性的传播。