Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, Australia.
Hum Reprod. 2021 Aug 18;36(9):2597-2611. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab099.
STUDY QUESTION: What are the causative genetic variants in patients with male infertility due to severe sperm motility disorders? SUMMARY ANSWER: We identified high confidence disease-causing variants in multiple genes previously associated with severe sperm motility disorders in 10 out of 21 patients (48%) and variants in novel candidate genes in seven additional patients (33%). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Severe sperm motility disorders are a form of male infertility characterised by immotile sperm often in combination with a spectrum of structural abnormalities of the sperm flagellum that do not affect viability. Currently, depending on the clinical sub-categorisation, up to 50% of causality in patients with severe sperm motility disorders can be explained by pathogenic variants in at least 22 genes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed exome sequencing in 21 patients with severe sperm motility disorders from two different clinics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: Two groups of infertile men, one from Argentina (n = 9) and one from Australia (n = 12), with clinically defined severe sperm motility disorders (motility <5%) and normal morphology values of 0-4%, were included. All patients in the Argentine cohort were diagnosed with DFS-MMAF, based on light and transmission electron microscopy. Sperm ultrastructural information was not available for the Australian cohort. Exome sequencing was performed in all 21 patients and variants with an allele frequency of <1% in the gnomAD population were prioritised and interpreted. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: In 10 of 21 patients (48%), we identified pathogenic variants in known sperm assembly genes: CFAP43 (3 patients); CFAP44 (2 patients), CFAP58 (1 patient), QRICH2 (2 patients), DNAH1 (1 patient) and DNAH6 (1 patient). The diagnostic rate did not differ markedly between the Argentinian and the Australian cohort (55% and 42%, respectively). Furthermore, we identified patients with variants in the novel human candidate sperm motility genes: DNAH12, DRC1, MDC1, PACRG, SSPL2C and TPTE2. One patient presented with variants in four candidate genes and it remains unclear which variants were responsible for the severe sperm motility defect in this patient. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In this study, we described patients with either a homozygous or two heterozygous candidate pathogenic variants in genes linked to sperm motility disorders. Due to unavailability of parental DNA, we have not assessed the frequency of de novo or maternally inherited dominant variants and could not determine the parental origin of the mutations to establish in all cases that the mutations are present on both alleles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results confirm the likely causal role of variants in six known genes for sperm motility and we demonstrate that exome sequencing is an effective method to diagnose patients with severe sperm motility disorders (10/21 diagnosed; 48%). Furthermore, our analysis revealed six novel candidate genes for severe sperm motility disorders. Genome-wide sequencing of additional patient cohorts and re-analysis of exome data of currently unsolved cases may reveal additional variants in these novel candidate genes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This project was supported in part by funding from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1120356) to M.K.O.B., J.A.V. and R.I.M.L., The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (918-15-667) to J.A.V., the Royal Society and Wolfson Foundation (WM160091) to J.A.V., as well as an Investigator Award in Science from the Wellcome Trust (209451) to J.A.V. and Grants from the National Research Council of Argentina (PIP 0900 and 4584) and ANPCyT (PICT 9591) to H.E.C. and a UUKi Rutherford Fund Fellowship awarded to B.J.H.
研究问题:导致严重精子运动障碍的男性不育患者的致病遗传变异是什么?
总结答案:我们在 21 名患者中的 10 名(48%)中鉴定出先前与严重精子运动障碍相关的多个基因中的高可信度疾病致病变异,在另外 7 名患者(33%)中鉴定出新型候选基因中的变异。
已知情况:严重精子运动障碍是一种男性不育形式,其特征是精子通常不动,并且常伴有精子鞭毛结构异常,但不影响活力。目前,根据临床亚分类,多达 50%的严重精子运动障碍患者的病因可通过至少 22 个基因中的致病变异来解释。
研究设计、大小和持续时间:我们对来自两个不同诊所的 21 名严重精子运动障碍患者进行了外显子组测序。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:两个不育男性组,一组来自阿根廷(n=9),一组来自澳大利亚(n=12),临床定义为严重精子运动障碍(运动率<5%),形态值正常为 0-4%。所有阿根廷队列的患者均根据光镜和透射电镜诊断为 DFS-MMAF。澳大利亚队列的精子超微结构信息不可用。对所有 21 名患者进行了外显子组测序,并对 gnomAD 人群中等位基因频率<1%的变异进行了优先级排序和解释。
主要结果和机会的作用:在 21 名患者中的 10 名(48%)中,我们鉴定出了已知精子组装基因中的致病变异:CFAP43(3 名患者);CFAP44(2 名患者);CFAP58(1 名患者);QRICH2(2 名患者);DNAH1(1 名患者)和 DNAH6(1 名患者)。阿根廷队列和澳大利亚队列的诊断率没有明显差异(分别为 55%和 42%)。此外,我们还鉴定出了新型人类候选精子运动基因中的患者变异:DNAH12、DRC1、MDC1、PACRG、SSPL2C 和 TPTE2。一名患者同时存在四个候选基因的变异,目前尚不清楚该患者的严重精子运动缺陷是由哪些变异引起的。
大规模数据:无。
局限性、谨慎的原因:在这项研究中,我们描述了具有与精子运动障碍相关基因的纯合或两个杂合候选致病变异的患者。由于无法获得父母的 DNA,我们尚未评估新生或母系显性变异的频率,也无法确定突变的亲本来源,以确定所有情况下突变都存在于两个等位基因上。
更广泛的影响:我们的研究结果证实了已知与精子运动相关的六个基因中的变异可能具有因果作用,并且我们证明外显子组测序是诊断严重精子运动障碍患者的有效方法(21 名诊断患者中的 10 名;48%)。此外,我们的分析揭示了六个新的严重精子运动障碍候选基因。对其他患者队列进行全基因组测序,并重新分析目前未解决病例的外显子组数据,可能会在这些新的候选基因中发现额外的变异。
研究资金/利益冲突:本项目部分得到澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会(APP1120356)、荷兰科学研究组织(918-15-667)、英国皇家学会和沃尔夫森基金会(WM160091)对 J.A.V. 的资助,以及英国 Wellcome Trust 对 J.A.V. 的 209451 号 Investigator Award in Science 资助,以及国家研究理事会(PIP 0900 和 4584)和阿根廷国家科学技术研究理事会(ANPCyT)对 H.E.C. 的资助,以及英国 UUKi Rutherford 基金奖学金对 B.J.H. 的资助。
Reports (MDPI). 2025-2-9
Cell Death Discov. 2025-5-23
Libyan J Med. 2025-12
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025-2
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024-11
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-9-27
BMC Med Genomics. 2024-9-12
G3 (Bethesda). 2020-12-3
Hum Reprod Update. 2020-6-18
J Med Genet. 2020-7
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020-3