Alimentiv, London, ON, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2372-2384. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00666-8. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
The global prevalence of ulcerative colitis is increasing, and induction and maintenance of remission is a crucial therapeutic goal. We assessed the efficacy and safety of filgotinib, a once-daily, oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, for treatment of ulcerative colitis.
This phase 2b/3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial including two induction studies and one maintenance study was done in 341 study centres in 40 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis for at least 6 months before enrolment (induction study A: inadequate clinical response, loss of response to or intolerance to corticosteroids or immunosuppressants, naive to tumour necrosis factor [TNF] antagonists and vedolizumab [biologic-naive]; induction study B: inadequate clinical response, loss of response to or intolerance to any TNF antagonist or vedolizumab, no TNF antagonist or vedolizumab use within 8 weeks before screening [biologic-experienced]). Patients were randomly assigned 2:2:1 to receive oral filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo once per day for 11 weeks. Patients who had either clinical remission or a Mayo Clinic Score response at week 10 in either induction study entered the maintenance study. Patients who received induction filgotinib were rerandomised 2:1 to continue their induction filgotinib regimen or to placebo. Patients who received induction placebo continued receiving placebo. The primary endpoint was clinical remission by Mayo endoscopic, rectal bleeding, and stool frequency subscores at weeks 10 and 58. For the induction studies, efficacy was assessed in all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo within that study. For the maintenance study, efficacy was assessed in all patients randomised to any filgotinib treatment group in the induction studies who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo in the maintenance study. Patients who received placebo throughout the induction and maintenance study were not included in the full analysis set for the maintenance study. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug or placebo within each study. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02914522.
Between Nov 14, 2016, and March 31, 2020, we screened 2040 patients for eligibility. 659 patients enrolled in induction study A were randomly assigned to receive filgotinib 100 mg (n=277), filgotinib 200 mg (n=245), or placebo (n=137). 689 patients enrolled into induction study B were randomly assigned to receive filgotinib 100 mg (n=285), filgotinib 200 mg (n=262), or placebo (n=142). 34 patients in induction study A and 54 patients in induction study B discontinued the study drug before week 10. After efficacy assessment at week 10, 664 patients entered the maintenance study (391 from induction study A, 273 from induction study B). 93 patients continued to receive placebo. 270 patients who had received filgotinib 100 mg in the induction study were randomly assigned to receive filgotinib 100 mg (n=179) or placebo (n=91). 301 patients who had received filgotinib 200 mg in the induction study were randomly assigned to receive filgotinib 200 mg (n=202) or placebo (n=99). 263 patients discontinued treatment in the maintenance study. At week 10, a greater proportion of patients given filgotinib 200 mg had clinical remission than those given placebo (induction study A 26·1% vs 15·3%, difference 10·8%; 95% CI 2·1-19·5, p=0·0157; induction study B 11·5% vs 4·2%, 7·2%; 1·6-12·8, p=0·0103). At week 58, 37·2% of patients given filgotinib 200 mg had clinical remission versus 11·2% in the respective placebo group (difference 26·0%, 95% CI 16·0-35·9; p<0·0001). Clinical remission was not significantly different between filgotinib 100 mg and placebo at week 10, but was significant by week 58 (23·8% vs 13·5%, 10·4%; 0·0-20·7, p=0·0420). The incidence of serious adverse events and adverse events of interest was similar between treatment groups. In the induction studies, serious adverse events occurred in 28 (5·0%) of 562 patients given filgotinib 100 mg, 22 (4·3%) of 507 patients given filgotinib 200 mg, and 13 (4·7%) of 279 patients given placebo. In the maintenance study, serious adverse events were reported in eight (4·5%) of 179 patients given filgotinib 100 mg, seven (7·7%) of 91 patients in the respective placebo group, nine (4·5%) of 202 patients in the filgotinib 200 mg group, and no patients in the respective placebo group. No deaths were reported during either induction study. Two patients died during the maintenance study; neither was related to treatment.
Filgotinib 200 mg was well tolerated, and efficacious in inducing and maintaining clinical remission compared with placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Gilead Sciences.
溃疡性结肠炎的全球患病率正在上升,诱导并维持缓解是至关重要的治疗目标。我们评估了每日一次、口服的 Janus 激酶 1 选择性抑制剂 filgotinib 治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性。
这是一项在 40 个国家的 341 个研究中心进行的 2b/3 期、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,包括两项诱导研究和一项维持研究。纳入的患者年龄在 18-75 岁之间,在入组前(诱导研究 A:对皮质类固醇或免疫抑制剂的临床反应不足、无反应或不耐受;初治 TNF 拮抗剂和 vedolizumab[生物初治];诱导研究 B:对任何 TNF 拮抗剂或 vedolizumab 的临床反应不足、无反应或不耐受;在筛选前 8 周内未使用 TNF 拮抗剂或 vedolizumab[生物经验丰富])患有中重度溃疡性结肠炎至少 6 个月。患者以 2:2:1 的比例随机接受每日一次的 filgotinib 200mg、filgotinib 100mg 或安慰剂治疗 11 周。在两项诱导研究中,任何一项研究中第 10 周时临床缓解或 Mayo 临床评分应答的患者进入维持研究。接受诱导性 filgotinib 治疗的患者以 2:1 的比例重新随机接受其诱导性 filgotinib 方案或安慰剂治疗。接受诱导性安慰剂治疗的患者继续接受安慰剂治疗。主要终点是第 10 周和第 58 周时 Mayo 内镜、直肠出血和粪便频率亚评分的临床缓解。对于诱导研究,在该研究中接受至少一剂研究药物或安慰剂的所有随机患者中评估疗效。对于维持研究,在诱导研究中接受任何 filgotinib 治疗组的所有患者中评估疗效,这些患者在维持研究中接受了至少一剂研究药物或安慰剂。在整个诱导和维持研究中接受安慰剂的患者不包括维持研究的全分析集。所有接受至少一剂研究药物或安慰剂的患者均评估安全性。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02914522。
在 2016 年 11 月 14 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间,我们筛选了 2040 名患者以确定其是否符合入选条件。659 名入组诱导研究 A 的患者被随机分配接受 filgotinib 100mg(n=277)、filgotinib 200mg(n=245)或安慰剂(n=137)。689 名入组诱导研究 B 的患者被随机分配接受 filgotinib 100mg(n=285)、filgotinib 200mg(n=262)或安慰剂(n=142)。34 名诱导研究 A 中的患者和 54 名诱导研究 B 中的患者在第 10 周前停止使用研究药物。在第 10 周时进行疗效评估后,664 名患者进入维持研究(391 名来自诱导研究 A,273 名来自诱导研究 B)。93 名患者继续接受安慰剂治疗。在诱导研究中接受 filgotinib 100mg 的 270 名患者被随机分配接受 filgotinib 100mg(n=179)或安慰剂(n=91)。在诱导研究中接受 filgotinib 200mg 的 301 名患者被随机分配接受 filgotinib 200mg(n=202)或安慰剂(n=99)。在维持研究中,263 名患者停止治疗。第 10 周时,接受 filgotinib 200mg 治疗的患者中,临床缓解的比例高于接受安慰剂的患者(诱导研究 A:26.1% vs 15.3%,差异 10.8%;95%CI 2.1-19.5,p=0.0157;诱导研究 B:11.5% vs 4.2%,7.2%;1.6-12.8,p=0.0103)。第 58 周时,接受 filgotinib 200mg 治疗的患者中有 37.2%达到临床缓解,而相应安慰剂组为 11.2%(差异 26.0%,95%CI 16.0-35.9;p<0.0001)。第 10 周时,filgotinib 100mg 与安慰剂相比,临床缓解率无显著差异,但第 58 周时显著(23.8% vs 13.5%,10.4%;0.0-20.7,p=0.0420)。治疗组之间严重不良事件和关注的不良事件发生率相似。在诱导研究中,接受 filgotinib 100mg 治疗的 562 名患者中有 28 名(5.0%)、接受 filgotinib 200mg 治疗的 507 名患者中有 22 名(4.3%)和接受安慰剂治疗的 279 名患者中有 13 名(4.7%)发生严重不良事件。在维持研究中,接受 filgotinib 100mg 治疗的 179 名患者中有 8 名(4.5%)、接受安慰剂治疗的 91 名患者中有 7 名(7.7%)、接受 filgotinib 200mg 治疗的 202 名患者中有 9 名(4.5%)和接受安慰剂治疗的相应组中无患者报告严重不良事件。在两项诱导研究中均无死亡报告。在维持研究中,有 2 名患者死亡;两者均与治疗无关。
与安慰剂相比,每日一次、口服的 Janus 激酶 1 选择性抑制剂 filgotinib 可有效诱导并维持中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者的临床缓解,且耐受性良好。
吉利德科学公司。