Suppr超能文献

康奈尔和间歇式减少光照方案对蛋鸡的比较。

Comparison of the Cornell and Bio-mittent reduced lighting programmes for laying hens.

作者信息

Cunningham D L

机构信息

Department of Poultry and Avian Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 1988 Jun;29(2):265-71. doi: 10.1080/00071668808417051.

Abstract

The Cornell (8L:10D:2L:4D) and (Ralston Purina) Biomittent lighting programmes were applied to a commercial strain of White Leghorn laying hens from 20 to 64 weeks of age. 2. The egg production of hens exposed to the Cornell lighting was reduced compared to the Bio-mittent programme. 3. Food consumption was less and efficiency of utilisation significantly improved for the Cornell programme during phase I (20 to 36 weeks) of the study. Significant differences were not observed during phase II (37 to 64 weeks) or for the whole cycle (20 to 64 weeks). 4. Body weights were significantly greater for hens exposed to the Bio-mittent programme during both phases I and II. 5. Egg weights, egg mass and egg weight distributions were not different for hens exposed to the 2 programmes. 6. Food costs and the margin of income over food costs were significantly in favour of the Cornell programme during phase I. However, differences for phase II and the complete cycle were not significant. 7. The Bio-mittent programme offered a computed advantage of 14.4% fewer hours of light usage compared to the Cornell programme.

摘要
  1. 将康奈尔(8小时光照:10小时黑暗:2小时光照:4小时黑暗)和(拉尔斯顿·普瑞纳)间歇光照方案应用于20至64周龄的商用白来航母鸡品系。2. 与间歇光照方案相比,接受康奈尔光照的母鸡产蛋量有所下降。3. 在研究的第一阶段(20至36周),康奈尔方案的母鸡采食量减少,利用效率显著提高。在第二阶段(37至64周)或整个周期(20至64周)未观察到显著差异。4. 在第一阶段和第二阶段,接受间歇光照方案的母鸡体重均显著更高。5. 接受这两种光照方案的母鸡的蛋重、产蛋量和蛋重分布没有差异。6. 在第一阶段,食物成本以及食物成本之上的收入 margin 显著有利于康奈尔方案。然而,第二阶段和整个周期的差异不显著。7. 与康奈尔方案相比,间歇光照方案计算得出的光照使用小时数少14.4%。 (注:“margin of income over food costs”直译为“食物成本之上的收入 margin”,这里“margin”不太明确具体准确含义,可能是利润之类,需结合更专业背景判断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验