Suppr超能文献

基于网络的直接面向用户的传输培训计划的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a Web-Based Direct-to-User Transfer Training Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):807-815.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a web-based, direct-to-user transfer training program in improving transfer quality and maintaining improvements for up to 1 month after training as compared with a control group.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with participants randomized to an immediate intervention group (IIG) or waitlist control group (WLCG) that received the training after a 6-month delay.

SETTING

Wherever the participants accessed the web-based training, likely the home environment.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of full-time wheelchair users (N=72; IIG, n=34; WLCG, n=38 for between-group analysis, n=48 for combined within-group analysis) with spinal cord injury or disorder who were able to independently perform a lateral scoot transfer.

INTERVENTIONS

Self-paced, web-based transfer training module.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Transfer Assessment Instrument Questionnaire (TAI-Q) score at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months postbaseline (WLCG only), immediately posttraining, and 1 month posttraining. The TAI-Q is an 18-item self-assessment that covers several aspects of a quality transfer.

RESULTS

The IIG significantly increased particpants' baseline TAI-Q score from 6.91±0.98 to 7.79±1.12 (P<.001) by 1 month posttraining. The WLCG also increased from baseline to the 1-month postbaseline assessment (from 6.52±1.13 to 7.00±1.09; P=.014), potentially from learning effects secondary to self-assessment with the TAI-Q. The extent of change over time did not differ significantly between the IIG and WLCG from baseline to 1 month (P=.169). However, significant improvements in TAI-Q scores were still evident after the training for the WLCG (P<.001). Those with a lower pretraining TAI-Q score and more shoulder pain were most likely to benefit from the training.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated TAI-Q self-assessments likely contributed to improved transfer quality, with web-based training having an additive effect. Wheelchair users are likely to benefit from transfer training and self-assessment of transfer quality in their home environments. This has the potential to decrease injury risk while avoiding barriers to in-person training.

摘要

目的

与对照组相比,确定基于网络的直接面向用户的转移动作训练计划在提高转移动作质量和维持改善方面的有效性,时间最长可达训练后 1 个月。

设计

参与者随机分为即时干预组(IIG)或候补对照组(WLCG)的随机对照试验,两组均在 6 个月的延迟后接受训练。

地点

参与者访问基于网络的培训的任何地点,可能是家庭环境。

参与者

符合条件的全职轮椅使用者(N=72;IIG,n=34;WLCG,n=38 进行组间分析,n=48 进行合并组内分析),患有脊髓损伤或疾病,能够独立进行侧滑转移动作。

干预措施

自我调节的基于网络的转移动作训练模块。

主要观察指标

基线、1 个月和 6 个月时的转移动作评估工具问卷(TAI-Q)评分(仅 WLCG),即时培训后和 1 个月培训后。TAI-Q 是一个 18 项的自我评估,涵盖了转移动作质量的几个方面。

结果

IIG 组参与者的 TAI-Q 评分从基线时的 6.91±0.98 显著增加到 1 个月时的 7.79±1.12(P<.001)。WLCG 组也从基线增加到 1 个月时的基线评估(从 6.52±1.13 增加到 7.00±1.09;P=.014),这可能是由于 TAI-Q 的自我评估而产生的学习效应。从基线到 1 个月时,IIG 和 WLCG 之间的时间变化程度没有显著差异(P=.169)。然而,WLCG 组在培训后 TAI-Q 评分仍有显著改善(P<.001)。那些基线 TAI-Q 评分较低和肩部疼痛较多的人最有可能从培训中受益。

结论

重复的 TAI-Q 自我评估可能有助于提高转移动作质量,而基于网络的培训具有附加作用。轮椅使用者可能会受益于家庭环境中的转移动作训练和转移动作质量的自我评估。这有可能降低受伤风险,同时避免面对面培训的障碍。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Web-Based Direct-to-User Transfer Training Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):807-815.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
Investigating the Efficacy of Web-Based Transfer Training on Independent Wheelchair Transfers Through Randomized Controlled Trials.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):9-16.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Maintenance Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):790-797. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.031. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Short-term influence of transfer training among full time pediatric wheelchair users: A randomized trial.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Jul;40(4):396-404. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1149292. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
Immediate Biomechanical Implications of Transfer Component Skills Training on Independent Wheelchair Transfers.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1785-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Skills Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1777-1784.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Transfer Assessment Instrument Questionnaire as a Self-Assessment Measure.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Nov 2;2(4):100088. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100088. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Transfer Technique Is Associated With Shoulder Pain and Pathology in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Investigation.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1770-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Internet Use Over Time Among Individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):832-839.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Transfer Assessment Instrument Questionnaire as a Self-Assessment Measure.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Nov 2;2(4):100088. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100088. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Clinimetrics: The Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI).
J Physiother. 2019 Jan;65(1):55. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Revised Transfer Assessment Instrument.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer;24(3):217-226. doi: 10.1310/sci2403-217.
5
Upper-limb biomechanical analysis of wheelchair transfer techniques in two toilet configurations.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Jun;55:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 May;14(4):391-409. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1456566. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
The Weight-Bearing Shoulder.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Jan 1;26(1):3-13. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00598.
8
Investigating the Efficacy of Web-Based Transfer Training on Independent Wheelchair Transfers Through Randomized Controlled Trials.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):9-16.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Geographic Variation in Outpatient Health Care Service Utilization After Spinal Cord Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.09.130. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
Transfer component skill deficit rates among Veterans who use wheelchairs.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(2):279-94. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.02.0023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验