Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):807-815.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
To determine the effectiveness of a web-based, direct-to-user transfer training program in improving transfer quality and maintaining improvements for up to 1 month after training as compared with a control group.
Randomized controlled trial with participants randomized to an immediate intervention group (IIG) or waitlist control group (WLCG) that received the training after a 6-month delay.
Wherever the participants accessed the web-based training, likely the home environment.
Convenience sample of full-time wheelchair users (N=72; IIG, n=34; WLCG, n=38 for between-group analysis, n=48 for combined within-group analysis) with spinal cord injury or disorder who were able to independently perform a lateral scoot transfer.
Self-paced, web-based transfer training module.
Transfer Assessment Instrument Questionnaire (TAI-Q) score at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months postbaseline (WLCG only), immediately posttraining, and 1 month posttraining. The TAI-Q is an 18-item self-assessment that covers several aspects of a quality transfer.
The IIG significantly increased particpants' baseline TAI-Q score from 6.91±0.98 to 7.79±1.12 (P<.001) by 1 month posttraining. The WLCG also increased from baseline to the 1-month postbaseline assessment (from 6.52±1.13 to 7.00±1.09; P=.014), potentially from learning effects secondary to self-assessment with the TAI-Q. The extent of change over time did not differ significantly between the IIG and WLCG from baseline to 1 month (P=.169). However, significant improvements in TAI-Q scores were still evident after the training for the WLCG (P<.001). Those with a lower pretraining TAI-Q score and more shoulder pain were most likely to benefit from the training.
Repeated TAI-Q self-assessments likely contributed to improved transfer quality, with web-based training having an additive effect. Wheelchair users are likely to benefit from transfer training and self-assessment of transfer quality in their home environments. This has the potential to decrease injury risk while avoiding barriers to in-person training.
与对照组相比,确定基于网络的直接面向用户的转移动作训练计划在提高转移动作质量和维持改善方面的有效性,时间最长可达训练后 1 个月。
参与者随机分为即时干预组(IIG)或候补对照组(WLCG)的随机对照试验,两组均在 6 个月的延迟后接受训练。
参与者访问基于网络的培训的任何地点,可能是家庭环境。
符合条件的全职轮椅使用者(N=72;IIG,n=34;WLCG,n=38 进行组间分析,n=48 进行合并组内分析),患有脊髓损伤或疾病,能够独立进行侧滑转移动作。
自我调节的基于网络的转移动作训练模块。
基线、1 个月和 6 个月时的转移动作评估工具问卷(TAI-Q)评分(仅 WLCG),即时培训后和 1 个月培训后。TAI-Q 是一个 18 项的自我评估,涵盖了转移动作质量的几个方面。
IIG 组参与者的 TAI-Q 评分从基线时的 6.91±0.98 显著增加到 1 个月时的 7.79±1.12(P<.001)。WLCG 组也从基线增加到 1 个月时的基线评估(从 6.52±1.13 增加到 7.00±1.09;P=.014),这可能是由于 TAI-Q 的自我评估而产生的学习效应。从基线到 1 个月时,IIG 和 WLCG 之间的时间变化程度没有显著差异(P=.169)。然而,WLCG 组在培训后 TAI-Q 评分仍有显著改善(P<.001)。那些基线 TAI-Q 评分较低和肩部疼痛较多的人最有可能从培训中受益。
重复的 TAI-Q 自我评估可能有助于提高转移动作质量,而基于网络的培训具有附加作用。轮椅使用者可能会受益于家庭环境中的转移动作训练和转移动作质量的自我评估。这有可能降低受伤风险,同时避免面对面培训的障碍。