Suppr超能文献

生物合成可吸收补片用于高危美国疾病控制与预防中心I类腹疝修补术的疗效:单术者系列研究

Outcomes of biosynthetic absorbable mesh use in high risk CDC Class I ventral hernia repair: a single surgeon series.

作者信息

Smith A, Slater K

机构信息

Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02424-6. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Biosynthetic absorbable meshes have emerged as suitable alternatives to permanent synthetic and biologic meshes in complex ventral hernia repair in contaminated wounds. Evidence regarding the use of these products in clean wounds is currently scant. This paper presents a large single surgeon series using GOREBIO-A (W.L. Gore & Associates, Newark, DE) (Bio-A) tissue reinforcement in high risk patients with predominantly CDC Class I wounds.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair with biosynthetic absorbable mesh was conducted. Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification based on patient demographics and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) wound type were collected prospectively. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

155 patients were included with a mean post-operative follow up of 29 months (range 12-62 months). Mean age was 61.8 years with an average BMI of 33.5 kg/m. 147 patients (94.9%) were classified as VHWG 2 or 3 based on comorbidities or surgical field contamination. 69% (n = 107) of wounds were designated CDC Class I. Mean hernia size was 119.7cm with recurrent defects comprising 32.3% (n = 50). Retrorectus mesh repair was achieved in 84.5% of patients (n  = 131). Post-operative wound events occurred in 19.3%. No mesh was explanted. Hernia recurrence rate was 9.0% with a mean time to recurrence of 14 months. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between clean and contaminated wounds.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of Bio-A in high risk ventral hernias, demonstrating a safe and durable repair across all wound classes. Ongoing follow-up continues to monitor for late complications and recurrence.

摘要

目的

在污染伤口的复杂腹疝修补中,生物合成可吸收补片已成为永久性合成补片和生物补片的合适替代品。目前,关于这些产品在清洁伤口中的使用证据不足。本文介绍了一个由单一外科医生完成的大型系列病例,该系列使用戈尔生物-A(W.L.戈尔公司,纽瓦克,特拉华州)(生物-A)组织加强材料治疗主要为疾病控制中心(CDC)I类伤口的高危患者。

方法

对前瞻性维护的连续接受开放性腹疝修补并使用生物合成可吸收补片的患者数据库进行回顾性分析。前瞻性收集基于患者人口统计学和疾病控制中心(CDC)伤口类型的腹疝工作组(VHWG)分类。所有患者术后至少随访12个月。

结果

纳入155例患者,术后平均随访29个月(范围12 - 62个月)。平均年龄61.8岁,平均体重指数33.5kg/m²。根据合并症或手术野污染情况,147例患者(94.9%)被分类为VHWG 2或3。69%(n = 107)的伤口被指定为CDC I类。平均疝大小为119.7cm,复发缺损占32.3%(n = 50)。84.5%的患者(n = 131)实现了腹直肌后补片修补。术后伤口事件发生率为19.3%。没有补片被取出。疝复发率为9.0%,平均复发时间为14个月。清洁伤口和污染伤口的复发率没有显著差异。

结论

本研究支持在高危腹疝中使用生物-A,表明其在所有伤口类别中均能实现安全持久的修补。持续的随访将继续监测晚期并发症和复发情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验