Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, 305-0901, Japan.
College of Agriculture and Applied Biology, Can Tho University, Can Tho City, Viet Nam.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 15;294:112900. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112900. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
It is essential to increase the production of foods to meet the increasing future food demand, but this should be done in an environmentally sustainable manner. Integrated crop-livestock systems have been suggested to balance the reduction of environmental impacts and the increase in food production. Here we assessed and compared the environmental impacts of specialized (SPC) and integrated (ITG) rice and beef production systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, using a life-cycle assessment (LCA). The productions of rice and beef are separated in the SPC, whereas they are integrated in the ITG: cattle manure is treated by a biodigester for biogas production, its digestate is applied to rice paddy fields as fertilizer, and part of the rice straw is used as cattle feed. We developed an LCA model based on data collected by site investigations of rice and beef farms and the relevant literature and LCA databases. Our evaluation of the ITG and SPC rice-beef production systems using the LCA revealed that among the four environmental impact categories investigated herein, the ITG had less environmental impacts on climate change (22%), energy consumption (22%), and eutrophication (14%) compared to the SPC. With the ITG, the reduction of methane emissions from paddy fields, the avoided energy consumption by the biogas produced, and the lower ammonia, nitrate, and phosphorous emissions from cattle manure and no eutrophying pollutant emissions from grassland were the main contributors to the lower greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and eutrophication potential of this system, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed that the use of cover for digestate storage resulted in lower environmental impacts of the ITG system compared to SPC system in all of the impact categories investigated here. These results provide helpful information to develop a circular and resource-efficient rice and beef production system that balances increasing productivity with environmental sustainability in rice-producing countries, particularly in Asia.
要满足未来不断增长的粮食需求,就必须增加粮食产量,但这必须以环境可持续的方式进行。综合作物-牲畜系统被认为可以平衡减少环境影响和增加粮食生产。在这里,我们使用生命周期评估(LCA)评估和比较了越南湄公河三角洲专业化(SPC)和综合(ITG)水稻和牛肉生产系统的环境影响。SPC 中水稻和牛肉的生产是分开的,而 ITG 中则是综合的:牛粪通过生物消化器处理生产沼气,其消化物施用于稻田作为肥料,部分稻草用作牛饲料。我们根据对水稻和牛肉农场的现场调查以及相关文献和 LCA 数据库收集的数据,开发了一个 LCA 模型。我们使用 LCA 对 ITG 和 SPC 水稻-牛肉生产系统进行评估的结果表明,在所研究的四个环境影响类别中,与 SPC 相比,ITG 对气候变化(22%)、能源消耗(22%)和富营养化(14%)的环境影响较小。通过 ITG,可以减少稻田甲烷排放、避免沼气生产消耗的能源,以及减少牛粪氨、硝酸盐和磷排放以及草原富营养化污染物排放,从而降低温室气体排放、能源消耗和该系统的富营养化潜力。敏感性分析表明,与 SPC 系统相比,在所有研究的影响类别中,使用覆盖物储存消化物可使 ITG 系统的环境影响降低。这些结果为发展循环和资源高效的水稻和牛肉生产系统提供了有价值的信息,该系统在水稻生产国家平衡了提高生产力与环境可持续性。